A space probe is carried by a rocket into outer space where it continues to move on its own in a straight line.
What keeps the probe moving?
1. a propeller
2. Nothing; the probe will eventually stop.
3. None of these
4. The gravitation forces from different stars and planets
5. Nothing specific; in the absence of forces it would continue moving in a straight line.|||it's momentum keeps it going, and it will not not stop unless another force acts on it opposite to the direction it is moving
out of those choices I would go with number 5|||A space probe is carried by a rocket into outer space where it continues to move on its own in a straight line.
When the probe is released, it has the same velocity as it did before it was released.
When the probe is released, it has the same mass as it did before it was released.
When the probe is released, it has the same momentum as it did before it was released.
In the absence of external forces its momentum would continue moving it in a straight line
What keeps the probe moving?
1. a propeller
2. Nothing; the probe will eventually stop.
3. None of these
4. The gravitation forces from different stars and planets
5. Nothing specific; in the absence of forces it would continue moving in a straight line|||Nothing keeps it going. The rocket releases the probe and leaves it there in space. They should know when to let the rocket stop it's movement.
Tuesday, November 22, 2011
How much can I amp up the horse power on a 97 ford v6 probe GT?
I have Ford Probe GT and the current horse power is 164 and that is the factory set I was wondering how much horse power can the car achieve and what would I do in order to bring it up to the maximum horse power it can achieve?|||A turbo was an option when new. Maybe kit available or a add on super charger kit. Without modifying engine not much else.|||intake/headers/exhaust/port and polish. cams/ cam geared cam shaft/ and you should be good with about 190 to 215hp
A space probe on the surface of Mars sends a radio signal back to the Earth, a distance of 9.75 multiplied by?
A space probe on the surface of Mars sends a radio signal back to the Earth, a distance of 9.75 multiplied by 107 km. Radio waves travel at the speed of light (3.00 multiplied by 108 m/s). How many seconds does it take for the signal to reach the Earth?|||time = distance / velocity = 9.75 x 10^7 km / 3.00 x 10^8 m/s = 9.75 x 10^10 m / 3.00 x 10^8 m/s = 325 seconds|||I'm answering this question by other method i did 2 days ago in my physics class.
As Radio signal has same speed as LIGHT. It takes 8.3Min to travel from sun to earth and 12.67min from sun to mars.
If you subtract 12.67-8.3= you get 4.37min( from earth to mars)
To convert this in to seconds, you do conversions.
(4.37min/1)(60sec/1min) CROSS MULTIPLY this, cancel out min.
Your answer will be 262.3sec .|||Your numbers are not correct. Earth and Mars are much farther apart, and light travels much more quickly than that.
As Radio signal has same speed as LIGHT. It takes 8.3Min to travel from sun to earth and 12.67min from sun to mars.
If you subtract 12.67-8.3= you get 4.37min( from earth to mars)
To convert this in to seconds, you do conversions.
(4.37min/1)(60sec/1min) CROSS MULTIPLY this, cancel out min.
Your answer will be 262.3sec .|||Your numbers are not correct. Earth and Mars are much farther apart, and light travels much more quickly than that.
How do you use an amp probe for a 220v outlet?
i know how to do it for a 110v but do you but the probe around both or each and add?|||Put the probe around each hot wire (red %26amp; black) and the neutral wire individually, but don't add. If the load is connected only to the hot wires, the currents in the hot wires should be equal and there should be no current in the neutral wire. If there is something connected between one of the hot wires and the neutral, the current in the neutral should equal the difference between the currents in the two hot wires. To verify that the current does not exceed the circuit rating, compare the highest hot wire reading with the circuit breaker rating.
An electric clothes dryer may have the motor and timer connected between one of the hot wires and neutral and the heater connected between the two hot wires. Other loads may also have combinations of 110 and 220 volt loads connected internally.|||i would put the red in the hot side and the black in the negative, if you have 110 or around it then you good, then leave the black and move the red to the other hot, once again you should have 110. if both read 110 together they make 220|||amp probe implies you have a current meter, not a volt meter.
ammeters, current meters, always have to be in series with the load, ie, connect between one of the hot lines and the load.
.
An electric clothes dryer may have the motor and timer connected between one of the hot wires and neutral and the heater connected between the two hot wires. Other loads may also have combinations of 110 and 220 volt loads connected internally.|||i would put the red in the hot side and the black in the negative, if you have 110 or around it then you good, then leave the black and move the red to the other hot, once again you should have 110. if both read 110 together they make 220|||amp probe implies you have a current meter, not a volt meter.
ammeters, current meters, always have to be in series with the load, ie, connect between one of the hot lines and the load.
.
Why so many countries want to probe moon,what we can get from the moon?
Recently US want to back to moon program and China and india already has plan to probe moon.I wonder what we can get from the moon.As I know all those program are very expensive.|||There are three reasons--any one of which will justify the expense in the long run.
1) Solving the problems that have to be solved to get to the moon generates a wealth of scientific and technical knowledge--which will transfer into a variety of usfule technological applications right here on earth--making our lives better and spurring economic growth.
2) Ultimately, moving out into space gives us access to resources (as well as potential places like Mars where people can live) far in excess of the resources we could ever hope to have on Earth. But the capability of accessing thos resources requires that we develop a space-going technology far beyond what we have now. Going to the moon is a first step on the road to doing that.
3) The moon itself is an entire world. We already know it has extensive resources. And in at least one case (Helium 3) in far greater quantity thanon Earth--and that particular substance is an ideal fuel for nuclear fusion when we devlop that technology fully in a few decades.
Ummmm--there's a 4th reason, actually. National prestige. Up to a point that's okay--its fine to be proud of your country's accomplishments as long as it doesn't bet twisted into an excuse to deride or belittle others. But I mention it because to politicians it is important--because it translates into popular support.|||One day we all may have to move there|||Once India, Pakistan, Israel and USA are done blowing the world up with the Nukes. Where do you think all the presidents and important people from these countries would go?|||Well, the moon would be the best military base there is - no weapons can reach it and capable of striking anywhere on Earth. We might have to move if the world goes insane and nukes itself to oblivion. It's also a potential source of mining and water harvesting.|||almost everything you use in your every day life, has come from NASA research projects. everything from what you wear, how you wear it and even the mattresses you sleep on. hell, NASA invinted velcro. If we colonize the moon, that means we can start learning how to live on other planets.|||Yes it is expensive but it is worth it. what do we get? first off knowledge. second, a first step to colonization. eventually we are going to have to get off this rock; it is simply too dangerous. remember, if the planet goes one way or another (meteor, nuclear war, whatever) it wont just take us; it'll take Einstein, Eratosthenes, Sagan, Michelangelo and countless others. And all of this would have been for nothing.|||Well, we can get an insight possibly on how the Moon became a barren waste. Or how planets or the Solar System were formed.
Oh, don't forget the amount of Meteors (or Asteroids) that have struck the moon over the Millenniums that we can study their makeup from.
Oh... and as a possible living area for our quickly overcrowded planet, Mother Earth.|||It costs so much to start long trips into the cosmos from down here. It is much less expensive to start a star trek from the moon. America's NASA expects to find water ice at the moon's poles. Water, as you may be aware, can be broken down into Hydrogen and Oxygen - fuel for rockets.|||Gold, gold, GOLD. Silver and gold, silver and gold enough for everyone, hurry grab your pan and hip waiters and buy your seat on the next ship to the moon.|||I am rather surprised that those who replied before me have not even mentioned the possibility of H3. H3 is a form of Hydrogen that is 'easily' fusable. It is incredibly abundant on the moon. Energy alone would be worth it. Second, I think that the moon is the next step in humanities evolution. We have conqured our planet and need to move into the next parts of our solar system. The moon is a tremendous value for space exploration and colonization.|||When they get smart enough to put a telescope on the far side, We will see our galaxy more clearly Than we do with Hubble. Plus it is a natural Satellite. Duh.|||To own a piece of moon pie or even declare independent of a country's moon if NASA indeed faked their landing on moon.
As far as it goes, I still can't see the USA flag and the NASA space vehicle on the moon which they left it over there.
Did anyone know the land coordinates on the moon? :) cheers.|||Well, we got cool things like Tang, velcro and cordless drills from the Apollo program.
I think this is more about national prestige than practical benefit.|||One of the things that the being able to get resources from the moon will allow is orbital manufacturing. Zero Gravity manufacturing promises to allow for some incredible technology, but the cost to get materials from Earth to any sort of orbital platform is far to expensive. It would be ~ 20 times cheaper to get materials from the moon to such a platform. Also, oxygen could be derived from many of the materials on the moon.|||Technology advancement.|||We're tired of probing each other, so why not try something different? Most people on Earth just like saying the word 'probe'.
Probe...probe...probe. There. I feel better.
1) Solving the problems that have to be solved to get to the moon generates a wealth of scientific and technical knowledge--which will transfer into a variety of usfule technological applications right here on earth--making our lives better and spurring economic growth.
2) Ultimately, moving out into space gives us access to resources (as well as potential places like Mars where people can live) far in excess of the resources we could ever hope to have on Earth. But the capability of accessing thos resources requires that we develop a space-going technology far beyond what we have now. Going to the moon is a first step on the road to doing that.
3) The moon itself is an entire world. We already know it has extensive resources. And in at least one case (Helium 3) in far greater quantity thanon Earth--and that particular substance is an ideal fuel for nuclear fusion when we devlop that technology fully in a few decades.
Ummmm--there's a 4th reason, actually. National prestige. Up to a point that's okay--its fine to be proud of your country's accomplishments as long as it doesn't bet twisted into an excuse to deride or belittle others. But I mention it because to politicians it is important--because it translates into popular support.|||One day we all may have to move there|||Once India, Pakistan, Israel and USA are done blowing the world up with the Nukes. Where do you think all the presidents and important people from these countries would go?|||Well, the moon would be the best military base there is - no weapons can reach it and capable of striking anywhere on Earth. We might have to move if the world goes insane and nukes itself to oblivion. It's also a potential source of mining and water harvesting.|||almost everything you use in your every day life, has come from NASA research projects. everything from what you wear, how you wear it and even the mattresses you sleep on. hell, NASA invinted velcro. If we colonize the moon, that means we can start learning how to live on other planets.|||Yes it is expensive but it is worth it. what do we get? first off knowledge. second, a first step to colonization. eventually we are going to have to get off this rock; it is simply too dangerous. remember, if the planet goes one way or another (meteor, nuclear war, whatever) it wont just take us; it'll take Einstein, Eratosthenes, Sagan, Michelangelo and countless others. And all of this would have been for nothing.|||Well, we can get an insight possibly on how the Moon became a barren waste. Or how planets or the Solar System were formed.
Oh, don't forget the amount of Meteors (or Asteroids) that have struck the moon over the Millenniums that we can study their makeup from.
Oh... and as a possible living area for our quickly overcrowded planet, Mother Earth.|||It costs so much to start long trips into the cosmos from down here. It is much less expensive to start a star trek from the moon. America's NASA expects to find water ice at the moon's poles. Water, as you may be aware, can be broken down into Hydrogen and Oxygen - fuel for rockets.|||Gold, gold, GOLD. Silver and gold, silver and gold enough for everyone, hurry grab your pan and hip waiters and buy your seat on the next ship to the moon.|||I am rather surprised that those who replied before me have not even mentioned the possibility of H3. H3 is a form of Hydrogen that is 'easily' fusable. It is incredibly abundant on the moon. Energy alone would be worth it. Second, I think that the moon is the next step in humanities evolution. We have conqured our planet and need to move into the next parts of our solar system. The moon is a tremendous value for space exploration and colonization.|||When they get smart enough to put a telescope on the far side, We will see our galaxy more clearly Than we do with Hubble. Plus it is a natural Satellite. Duh.|||To own a piece of moon pie or even declare independent of a country's moon if NASA indeed faked their landing on moon.
As far as it goes, I still can't see the USA flag and the NASA space vehicle on the moon which they left it over there.
Did anyone know the land coordinates on the moon? :) cheers.|||Well, we got cool things like Tang, velcro and cordless drills from the Apollo program.
I think this is more about national prestige than practical benefit.|||One of the things that the being able to get resources from the moon will allow is orbital manufacturing. Zero Gravity manufacturing promises to allow for some incredible technology, but the cost to get materials from Earth to any sort of orbital platform is far to expensive. It would be ~ 20 times cheaper to get materials from the moon to such a platform. Also, oxygen could be derived from many of the materials on the moon.|||Technology advancement.|||We're tired of probing each other, so why not try something different? Most people on Earth just like saying the word 'probe'.
Probe...probe...probe. There. I feel better.
I have a 1990 ford probe gt 4cyl turbo and im switching it from auto to manual any suggestions?
1990 ford probe gt turbo 4 cylinder im switching from an automatic transmission to a manual transmission does any one have any suggestions or know any good web sites to look at for answers?|||Well, on a twenty year old car that's worth around $1300, why bother? This isn't a classic car with a great reputation, it's a poorly built ford with dated styling. You can do better. Much better.
This car scored a 38 out of 100 by Consumerguide Automotive(in school, that's an F -- ). Poor ride quality, poor controls/materials, a very noisy ride, and early failure of the turbo fours were some of the low-lights. Souping this car up is like putting breast implants in a 70 year old woman.
If you do succeed with this project, don't ever leave your wallet at home. With the added stress placed on the aging engine and suspension, you'll be amazed at how fast things start to break.
I'd save up a little more dough, sell this thing off (it books around $1300), and get yourself a civic, celica, eclipse,etc. For around $2500 you can get any one of these cars in nice shape, with a reliable factory installed manual tranny. With the sale of your car, and the $ you save not doing the tranny, you're already really close.|||You could buy a manual shift probe a lot cheaper that making yours manual.
clutch pedal linkage assembly, brake pedal assy, transmission, cv axles, clutch kit, clutch master cylinder, slave cylinder, shifter assy, shifter linkage, flywheel, starter, computer, wiring harness, labor.
Many of these parts could be obsolete and unavailable. you could spend 4-5 times what the car is worth.|||advice is dont...after 1000 in cost maybe 1500 it will not run well unless you change ECU trade it in on your dream car..
This car scored a 38 out of 100 by Consumerguide Automotive(in school, that's an F -- ). Poor ride quality, poor controls/materials, a very noisy ride, and early failure of the turbo fours were some of the low-lights. Souping this car up is like putting breast implants in a 70 year old woman.
If you do succeed with this project, don't ever leave your wallet at home. With the added stress placed on the aging engine and suspension, you'll be amazed at how fast things start to break.
I'd save up a little more dough, sell this thing off (it books around $1300), and get yourself a civic, celica, eclipse,etc. For around $2500 you can get any one of these cars in nice shape, with a reliable factory installed manual tranny. With the sale of your car, and the $ you save not doing the tranny, you're already really close.|||You could buy a manual shift probe a lot cheaper that making yours manual.
clutch pedal linkage assembly, brake pedal assy, transmission, cv axles, clutch kit, clutch master cylinder, slave cylinder, shifter assy, shifter linkage, flywheel, starter, computer, wiring harness, labor.
Many of these parts could be obsolete and unavailable. you could spend 4-5 times what the car is worth.|||advice is dont...after 1000 in cost maybe 1500 it will not run well unless you change ECU trade it in on your dream car..
Probe thermometer for puddings cakes etc?
I use a probe thermometer for cooking joints of meat but does anybody know if it can be used for cooking cakes and pouddings. I cant seem to find a tempreature guideline.|||Ive never heard of a probe thermometer used for cakes and puddings but I use a knife and if it comes out clean its done. Top tip though, if you are baking a cake, be really carefull not to slam the oven door, the bang will make your cake sink. Its not the cold air that does it, its the bang.
Good luck. xxx|||Generally, if your oven is functioning properly, the TIME needed to bake as described in the recipie is enough. Check cakes with a bamboo shis-kebab skewer through the middle. If it comes out clean and dry, your cake is ready. If it comes out wet, you need to keep baking. Puddings are generally easy to tell...The top browns nicely if you are baking it. On stovetop, you neeed to keep stirring and watch the time. Once it starts to thicken up and the necessary time prescribed has passed, fill your ramekins and let it set in the fridge for at least 2 hours. Gas ranges are best as the tempreture is going to be dead on. Electric ranges kinda suck cos they get hot, then tune down...get hot, tune down...
follow the temp. and time guidelines on the box and you should be ok.|||generally with cakes you stick a skewer or knife in and if it comes out clean its cooked!
you can buy a "candy" thermometer and I assume it would come with instructions and guidelines for use.|||Yes but a good trick to do is to touch the top of the cake and if it bounces back and just comming away from the sides it means it is ready the last thing you want to do is to probe it
Good luck. xxx|||Generally, if your oven is functioning properly, the TIME needed to bake as described in the recipie is enough. Check cakes with a bamboo shis-kebab skewer through the middle. If it comes out clean and dry, your cake is ready. If it comes out wet, you need to keep baking. Puddings are generally easy to tell...The top browns nicely if you are baking it. On stovetop, you neeed to keep stirring and watch the time. Once it starts to thicken up and the necessary time prescribed has passed, fill your ramekins and let it set in the fridge for at least 2 hours. Gas ranges are best as the tempreture is going to be dead on. Electric ranges kinda suck cos they get hot, then tune down...get hot, tune down...
follow the temp. and time guidelines on the box and you should be ok.|||generally with cakes you stick a skewer or knife in and if it comes out clean its cooked!
you can buy a "candy" thermometer and I assume it would come with instructions and guidelines for use.|||Yes but a good trick to do is to touch the top of the cake and if it bounces back and just comming away from the sides it means it is ready the last thing you want to do is to probe it
What happened to the Huygens probe that landed on Titan?
I can't find anywhere on the net about the aftermath of the probe.|||The Huygens probe landed safely and continued to return data to Earth for 90 minutes, so at least it 'lived' on Titan's surface that long. Chances are good that it's still intact on the surface, but its batteries have long since died so no more data will be forthcoming.|||According to Wikipedia
The Huygens probe, supplied by the European Space Agency (ESA) and named after the Dutch 17th century astronomer Christiaan Huygens, is an atmospheric entry probe carried to Saturn's moon Titan as part of the Cassini-Huygens mission. The combined Cassini-Huygens spacecraft was launched from Earth on October 15, 1997. Huygens separated from the Cassini orbiter on December 25, 2004, and landed on Titan on January 14, 2005 near the Xanadu region. It touched down on land (the possibility that it would touch down in an ocean was also taken into account in the design). The probe continued to send data for about 90 minutes after reaching the surface.
Yet this article in
here is an article in 2005 talking about it.
14 January 2005
ESA PR 03-2005. Today, after its seven-year journey through the Solar System on board the Cassini spacecraft, ESA’s Huygens probe has successfully descended through the atmosphere of Titan, Saturn’s largest moon, and safely landed on its surface.
The first scientific data arrived at the European Space Operations Centre (ESOC) in Darmstadt, Germany, this afternoon at 17:19 CET. Huygens is mankind’s first successful attempt to land a probe on another world in the outer Solar System. “This is a great achievement for Europe and its US partners in this ambitious international endeavour to explore the Saturnian system,” said Jean-Jacques Dordain, ESA’s Director General.
Following its release from the Cassini mothership on 25 December, Huygens reached Titan’s outer atmosphere after 20 days and a 4 million km cruise. The probe started its descent through Titan’s hazy cloud layers from an altitude of about 1270 km at 11:13 CET. During the following three minutes Huygens had to decelerate from 18 000 to 1400 km per hour.
A sequence of parachutes then slowed it down to less than 300 km per hour. At a height of about 160 km the probe’s scientific instruments were exposed to Titan’s atmosphere. At about 120 km, the main parachute was replaced by a smaller one to complete the descent, with an expected touchdown at 13:34 CET. Preliminary data indicate that the probe landed safely, likely on a solid surface.
The probe began transmitting data to Cassini four minutes into its descent and continued to transmit data after landing at least as long as Cassini was above Titan’s horizon. The certainty that Huygens was alive came already at 11:25 CET today, when the Green Bank radio telescope in West Virginia, USA, picked up a faint but unmistakable radio signal from the probe. Radio telescopes on Earth continued to receive this signal well past the expected lifetime of Huygens.
Huygens data, relayed by Cassini, were picked up by NASA’s Deep Space Network and delivered immediately to ESA’s European Space Operation Centre in Darmstadt, Germany, where the scientific analysis is currently taking place.
“Titan was always the target in the Saturn system where the need for ‘ground truth’ from a probe was critical. It is a fascinating world and we are now eagerly awaiting the scientific results,” says Professor David Southwood, Director of ESA’s scientific programmme.
“The Huygens scientists are all delighted. This was worth the long wait,” says Dr Jean-Pierre Lebreton, ESA Huygens Mission Manager. Huygens is expected to provide the first direct and detailed sampling of Titan’s atmospheric chemistry and the first photographs of its hidden surface, and will supply a detailed ‘weather report’.
One of the main reasons for sending Huygens to Titan is that its nitrogen atmosphere, rich in methane, and its surface may contain many chemicals of the kind that existed on the young Earth. Combined with the Cassini observations, Huygens will afford an unprecedented view of Saturn’s mysterious moon.
“Descending through Titan was a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity and today’s achievement proves that our partnership with ESA was an excellent one,” says Alphonso Diaz, NASA Associate Administrator of Science.
The Cassini-Huygens mission is a cooperation between NASA, the European Space Agency and ASI, the Italian space agency. The Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), a division of the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, is managing the mission for NASA’s Office of Space Science, Washington. JPL designed, developed and assembled the Cassini orbiter.
“The teamwork in Europe and the USA, between scientists, industry and agencies has been extraordinary and has set the foundation for today’s enormous success,” concludes Jean-Jacques Dordain.
As for the finding, here is some of the aftermath. Also from wikipedia
Preliminary findings seemed to confirm the presence of large bodies of liquid on the surface of Titan. The photos showed what appear to be large drainage channels crossing the lighter colored mainland into a dark sea. Some of the photos even seem to suggest islands and mist shrouded coastline.
At the landing site there were indications of chunks of water ice scattered over an orange surface, the majority of which is covered by a thin haze of methane. The instruments revealed "a dense cloud or thick haze approximately 18-20 kilometers from the surface". The surface itself was reported to be a clay-like "material which might have a thin crust followed by a region of relative uniform consistency." One ESA scientist compared the texture and color of Titan's surface to a Crème brûlée, but admitted this term probably would not appear in the published papers.
On January 18 it was reported that Huygens landed in "Titanian mud", and the landing site was estimated to lie within the white circle on the picture to the right. Mission scientists also reported a first "descent profile", which describes the trajectory the probe took during its descent.
However, subsequent analysis of the data suggests that surface consistency readings were likely caused by Huygens displacing a large pebble as it landed, and that the surface is better described as a 'sand' made of ice grains.[1] The images taken after the probe's landing show a flat plain covered in pebbles. The pebbles, which may be made of water ice, are somewhat rounded, which may indicate the action of fluids on them.[2]
Further work done on the probe's trajectory indicate that in fact it landed within the dark 'sea' region in the photos. Photos of a dry landscape from the surface contradict the original theory that the dark regions were liquid seas, leading researchers to conclude that while there was evidence of liquid acting on the surface recently, the much anticipated hydrocarbon seas of Titan were in fact absent.|||It got traded on T-Bay
The Huygens probe, supplied by the European Space Agency (ESA) and named after the Dutch 17th century astronomer Christiaan Huygens, is an atmospheric entry probe carried to Saturn's moon Titan as part of the Cassini-Huygens mission. The combined Cassini-Huygens spacecraft was launched from Earth on October 15, 1997. Huygens separated from the Cassini orbiter on December 25, 2004, and landed on Titan on January 14, 2005 near the Xanadu region. It touched down on land (the possibility that it would touch down in an ocean was also taken into account in the design). The probe continued to send data for about 90 minutes after reaching the surface.
Yet this article in
here is an article in 2005 talking about it.
14 January 2005
ESA PR 03-2005. Today, after its seven-year journey through the Solar System on board the Cassini spacecraft, ESA’s Huygens probe has successfully descended through the atmosphere of Titan, Saturn’s largest moon, and safely landed on its surface.
The first scientific data arrived at the European Space Operations Centre (ESOC) in Darmstadt, Germany, this afternoon at 17:19 CET. Huygens is mankind’s first successful attempt to land a probe on another world in the outer Solar System. “This is a great achievement for Europe and its US partners in this ambitious international endeavour to explore the Saturnian system,” said Jean-Jacques Dordain, ESA’s Director General.
Following its release from the Cassini mothership on 25 December, Huygens reached Titan’s outer atmosphere after 20 days and a 4 million km cruise. The probe started its descent through Titan’s hazy cloud layers from an altitude of about 1270 km at 11:13 CET. During the following three minutes Huygens had to decelerate from 18 000 to 1400 km per hour.
A sequence of parachutes then slowed it down to less than 300 km per hour. At a height of about 160 km the probe’s scientific instruments were exposed to Titan’s atmosphere. At about 120 km, the main parachute was replaced by a smaller one to complete the descent, with an expected touchdown at 13:34 CET. Preliminary data indicate that the probe landed safely, likely on a solid surface.
The probe began transmitting data to Cassini four minutes into its descent and continued to transmit data after landing at least as long as Cassini was above Titan’s horizon. The certainty that Huygens was alive came already at 11:25 CET today, when the Green Bank radio telescope in West Virginia, USA, picked up a faint but unmistakable radio signal from the probe. Radio telescopes on Earth continued to receive this signal well past the expected lifetime of Huygens.
Huygens data, relayed by Cassini, were picked up by NASA’s Deep Space Network and delivered immediately to ESA’s European Space Operation Centre in Darmstadt, Germany, where the scientific analysis is currently taking place.
“Titan was always the target in the Saturn system where the need for ‘ground truth’ from a probe was critical. It is a fascinating world and we are now eagerly awaiting the scientific results,” says Professor David Southwood, Director of ESA’s scientific programmme.
“The Huygens scientists are all delighted. This was worth the long wait,” says Dr Jean-Pierre Lebreton, ESA Huygens Mission Manager. Huygens is expected to provide the first direct and detailed sampling of Titan’s atmospheric chemistry and the first photographs of its hidden surface, and will supply a detailed ‘weather report’.
One of the main reasons for sending Huygens to Titan is that its nitrogen atmosphere, rich in methane, and its surface may contain many chemicals of the kind that existed on the young Earth. Combined with the Cassini observations, Huygens will afford an unprecedented view of Saturn’s mysterious moon.
“Descending through Titan was a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity and today’s achievement proves that our partnership with ESA was an excellent one,” says Alphonso Diaz, NASA Associate Administrator of Science.
The Cassini-Huygens mission is a cooperation between NASA, the European Space Agency and ASI, the Italian space agency. The Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), a division of the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, is managing the mission for NASA’s Office of Space Science, Washington. JPL designed, developed and assembled the Cassini orbiter.
“The teamwork in Europe and the USA, between scientists, industry and agencies has been extraordinary and has set the foundation for today’s enormous success,” concludes Jean-Jacques Dordain.
As for the finding, here is some of the aftermath. Also from wikipedia
Preliminary findings seemed to confirm the presence of large bodies of liquid on the surface of Titan. The photos showed what appear to be large drainage channels crossing the lighter colored mainland into a dark sea. Some of the photos even seem to suggest islands and mist shrouded coastline.
At the landing site there were indications of chunks of water ice scattered over an orange surface, the majority of which is covered by a thin haze of methane. The instruments revealed "a dense cloud or thick haze approximately 18-20 kilometers from the surface". The surface itself was reported to be a clay-like "material which might have a thin crust followed by a region of relative uniform consistency." One ESA scientist compared the texture and color of Titan's surface to a Crème brûlée, but admitted this term probably would not appear in the published papers.
On January 18 it was reported that Huygens landed in "Titanian mud", and the landing site was estimated to lie within the white circle on the picture to the right. Mission scientists also reported a first "descent profile", which describes the trajectory the probe took during its descent.
However, subsequent analysis of the data suggests that surface consistency readings were likely caused by Huygens displacing a large pebble as it landed, and that the surface is better described as a 'sand' made of ice grains.[1] The images taken after the probe's landing show a flat plain covered in pebbles. The pebbles, which may be made of water ice, are somewhat rounded, which may indicate the action of fluids on them.[2]
Further work done on the probe's trajectory indicate that in fact it landed within the dark 'sea' region in the photos. Photos of a dry landscape from the surface contradict the original theory that the dark regions were liquid seas, leading researchers to conclude that while there was evidence of liquid acting on the surface recently, the much anticipated hydrocarbon seas of Titan were in fact absent.|||It got traded on T-Bay
Whats a great sounding muffler or exhaust for a ford Probe?
i have a 96-97 purple probe GT. its really nice, and want to choose a great muffler exhaust thing for it. anyone know some good names? or something?|||Leave it factory unless you want it to sound like a giant popcorn machine.|||it not the exhaust it the motor|||a glass pac but in some states they R illegal|||If you're gonna do it, do it right... Set of hotshot headers and a greddy cat-back, it'll sound REAL nice, and fairly quiet... I'd keep the stock cat on to save on it being too loud, but to each is own!
Is there a website where I may view the pictures of the moon taken by the Japanese probe?
Is there a website of the pictures the Japanese probe has taken?|||See the sources. That second one is in Japanese. There is an English version button at the top but it doesn't seem to have all the same images on that page.|||not at this moment
A probe is fired directly away from the sun. How long until it hits the sun?
The probe is initial 1 au from the sun. Its initial velocity is 1 au/year. This velocity is directly away from the sun in the reference frame of the sun. (i.e., in a direction radial to the sun).
The probe will travel directly outwards, and then it will slow down, stop and begin falling directly towards the sun until it hits it.
This is solvable without calculus by using Kepler's equations|||I'd rather start with the question you said you intended to ask in the previous posting, where initial velocity is 2pi au/yr. Even with this simplification I still couldn't get it all from Kepler.
With this velocity the probe has the same KE, PE and total E as the 1 au circular orbit.
PE0 = -GMm/r0, KE0 = -PE0/2 and E0 = PE0+KE0 = PE0/2.
The probe is in a degenerate elliptical (i.e., linear) orbit whose max PE = E0 = PE0/2 thus apoapsis = 2r0. Of course periapsis = 0. Then the semimajor axis = r0 and T1 = T0.
Fall time = T1/2 = 0.5 yr
Partial-distance rise time (from r0 to 2r0) is the same as fall time over that distance, which is a complicated function of distance (ref.):
t = sqrt(y0^3/(2*mu)) * (sqrt(y/y0*(1-y/y0)) + arccos(sqrt(y/y0))), where mu = GM, y0 is initial height = 2r0 and y is height at time t = r0.
Solving, rise time = 0.409155 yr
Total time to crash = 0.909155 yr or 28690158 s.
I really don't have the time to scale all this to a different velocity. If lithiumdeuteride cares to provide his derivation it would be hugely appreciated. I can't quite make sense of his velocity figures; with a 24 s time difference at 2E6 m/s, the solar radius comes out to only 48000 km vs. actual value of ~350000 km.
EDIT: OK, I found the time to program a calculator for this and solve for v = 1 au/yr. My answer basically agrees with LiD's.
KE (relative to circ. orbit) is reduced by a factor of 4pi^2 thus KE = -PE0/(8pi^2).
Adding KE to PE0 and solving,
apoapsis = r0*1/(1-1/(8pi^2)) = r0*1.01282761155353
SMA = apoapsis/2
T1 = T0*(SMA/r0)^1.5
Full-distance fall time = T1/2 = 0.5*T0*(0.5*1.01282761155353)^1.5 = 0.180189014324892 yr
Partial-distance rise time (from r0 to apoapsis) = 2.57646416217077E-02 yr
Total time to impact = 0.2059536559466 yr = 6499270 s
Re: jean-de-la-lune, I think we agree that KE = -PE/2 applies to any circular orbit. In this case we have initial PE of Earth's orbit, and with 2pi au/yr we have KE of Earth's orbit, so I don't see a problem with starting the analysis from the circ. orbit. I continued with the circ. orbit basis for comparison for the 1 au/yr case because that's how I started. Lazy, I guess. But the relation between the period and the SMA is the same for any ellipse, and thus the full-distance straight-down fall time is just half the period of an ellipse with infinitesimal width.|||If you look at the derivation I cited, be sure to also look at how you expand an ellipse to calculate areas per Kepler. Here is an example (but not for this problem). http://i278.photobucket.com/al鈥?/a>
|||Sorry for my eccentric behavior, again.
I suspected the second law but was to
lazy to try using it. Great question by
FGR, and many excellent answers.
Thank you, First Grade. I did learn.
|||Sorry I took so long to respond. As Al said, great question and a lesson learned. This definitely goes into the toolbox.
I wonder how crow tastes. Maybe if you catch one far from a landfill...
|||sorry but more information is needed for example, mass of probe and/or mass of sun in order to calculate the acceleration acting on the probe.|||If the Sun were a point mass, impact would be at approximately:
t = 6,498,620 s
But since it's not, impact instead occurs at approximately:
t = 6,498,596 s
At the time of impact, the probe is traveling at a speed of approximately:
v = 1,956,930 m/s
This solution doesn't take special relativity into account, but since the final impact velocity is only 0.006528 times light speed, the error should be small.|||Never, space is infinite and an object wouldn't fall back, it would keep going until an outside force was acted on it.|||This is a most confusing question. I withdrew my answer to the first version because I felt dissatisfied with the extrapolation to an 'ellipse' which would be a segment. And I think it is wrong and you have no right to apply Kepler's laws to such a trajectory. Mathematically, an ellipse turns into a parabola when eccentricity --%26gt;1 or it can degenerate into a pair of straight lines when you write the general conic section equation and impose certain conditions on the coefficients. But a segment, I don't see how. Physically, a trajectory through the center of force is completely different from a trajectory which has angular momentum.
Kirchway's equality KE = -PE/2 holds only because he modifies the assignement and takes 2Pi au/y velocity, which allows him to apply results valid for the earth. But of course KE=-PE/2 does not hold generally for a trajectory which ends in a finite time (the demonstration of the virial theorem does not hold) It does not hold if you take 1 au/y as initial velocity of your degenerate trajectory.
Flamechop and Magnetulsar are completely wrong since even if you had postulated a 2Pi au/y velocity, it would still be short by a factor sqrt(2) from the escape velocity. (and I assume 8th grade astronomy class is a joke)
So your answer can be found by integrating 1/sqrt[2(GM/r+C)] with C = v_0^2/2 - GM/Re first from Re to Rmax (with Rmax from C = -GM/Rmax) and then from Rmax to 0, but I don't see any way to derive it using Kepler's laws. Even if you did use them for the segment 0-Rmax seen as an ellipse of semi major axis Rmax/2, (which is not warranted in my opinion but it might be that the integral gives you the right relation for the 'half year'-you'll only know it by integrating !) you would still have to calculate the time from Re up to Rmax using integration.
Edited: I have just skimmed through dear old Lev Davidovitch and in (very) short: conservation of angular momentum (L) is equivalent to the area law which by integration yields 2m_eS = Te L with S the orbit area. Knowing it is an ellipse and having related the semi axes to G, M, L, E and m_e by using the conservation laws to solve for theta(r), you can eliminate both S and L (and m_e) and get Kepler's third law. Of course this one no longer depends on finite surface or non zero angular momentum, but you simply cannot derive it without using them.
To Sum Up: if you start from Newton, which is arguably the basis, there is no way to deduce Kepler's law for a zero angular momentum trajectory. (Besides, they are absolutely meaningless for such a trajectory) You have one and only one equation which is d^2r/dt^2 = -GM/r^2 which gives you a first (energy) integral, 1/2dr/dt-GM/r = C and by integrating that one can answer your question, but there is no way to short cut calculus.
Re: kirchway, of course I agree with KE = -PE/2 (for any periodical orbit actually) so you can use earth data to calculate initial KE in terms of Rearth by scaling the speed and then find Rmax.
My contention is that you have no right to use T^2 =kR^3 for the degenerate orbits going through the center because to demonstrate it, you need T to be a period (not a countdown time to an end) and R to be the SMA of a finite area ellipse.
This is a question of physics, not of math. Now since there is no apparent discontinuity in the formula, you can bet it is usable for the limiting case also. However you can only be sure by explicit integration (and of course, it works)
It remains that
a/ even with this somewhat dubious 'Kepler's law', you still have to perform an integration for the Re--%26gt;Rmax part (Done in your complicated formula)
b/ your final answer must be wrong..see below
LiD's remark about relativity not being important is valid only thanks to the finite solar size. Otherwise the speed grows without limit to compensate for PE --%26gt; -infinity and keep the total energy constant and finite. Then at some point one can no longer claim v/c %26lt;%26lt; 1 Because of that, LiD's time for the pointlike sun is certainly wrong and so is yours if your sun is pointlike
Actually there is an almost consistent way to consider the degenerate trajectory as the limit of an ellipse by using the angular momentum L as a parameter --%26gt;0 Keeping the energy fixed, the eccentricity--%26gt;1 (1-e^2 ~ L^2) the major axis is fixed, the minor axis--%26gt;0 (b ~ L) and the point of closest approach -%26gt;0 as L^2
The inconsistency lies in that this point is reached for theta=pi, that is, the 'other side' of the center with respect to what happens with the L=0 trajectory. Clearly, there can't exist a consistent way of treating angles when there are none in the limit.
The approximate time up calculation of AI P is beautiful but evidently wouldn't work with v=2Pi au/y|||If the probe was launched directly away from the Sun, it won't hit the Sun. Instead, it's speed would just reduce. Due to the Earth's distance from the Sun, any speed directly away from the Sun is enough to escape the Solar System. Unless it passes by an object that has enough gravity to cause the probe to change course. Then it would spiral in toward the Sun. But if the probe is traveling at 10,000s miles per hour, the only type of object in the Solar System that could cause it to change course a lot would be a giant planet. However, if it was launched from the Earth and not from a spacecraft in space not drifting, it would go in a curve anyways and not directly away from the Sun, and it would eventually begin to spiral in toward the Sun.|||If I'm understanding the question correctly, we are ignoring the movement of the sun during this period. And we have the differential equation:
r"(t) = -k/r^2
where k = 4蟺^2 au^3 / yr^2 approximately
subject to initial conditions
r(0) = 1 au
r'(0) = 1 au/yr
And we need to solve for when r = 0.004652 au (sun radius).
The difficulty is in solving this analytically. It can easily be solved numerically.
I'm getting 0.2059295 years = 75.2 days
*****
OK, there is an analytical approach. Start with
r^2 * r" = -k
Write v = r', therefore
r^2 dv/dt = r^2 dv/dr * dr/dt = -k
r^2 * v dv/dr = -k
v * dv = -k/r^2 * dr
Integrating with the initial conditions
v^2 - 1 = 2k * (1/r - 1)
v^2 = 1-2k + 2k/r
dr/dt = 鈭?(1-2k + 2k/r)
dt = 卤 dr / 鈭?(1-2k + 2k/r)
This is +ve during the ascent, and -ve during the descent.
This expression can be integrated, although it is really difficult to type out here.
dr/dt = 0 when r = 2k/(2k-1)
We can then find the time taken to reach the peak, the time taken to descend, then add them up.
I'm getting 0.2059298179 years or 75.21586599 days
The probe will travel directly outwards, and then it will slow down, stop and begin falling directly towards the sun until it hits it.
This is solvable without calculus by using Kepler's equations|||I'd rather start with the question you said you intended to ask in the previous posting, where initial velocity is 2pi au/yr. Even with this simplification I still couldn't get it all from Kepler.
With this velocity the probe has the same KE, PE and total E as the 1 au circular orbit.
PE0 = -GMm/r0, KE0 = -PE0/2 and E0 = PE0+KE0 = PE0/2.
The probe is in a degenerate elliptical (i.e., linear) orbit whose max PE = E0 = PE0/2 thus apoapsis = 2r0. Of course periapsis = 0. Then the semimajor axis = r0 and T1 = T0.
Fall time = T1/2 = 0.5 yr
Partial-distance rise time (from r0 to 2r0) is the same as fall time over that distance, which is a complicated function of distance (ref.):
t = sqrt(y0^3/(2*mu)) * (sqrt(y/y0*(1-y/y0)) + arccos(sqrt(y/y0))), where mu = GM, y0 is initial height = 2r0 and y is height at time t = r0.
Solving, rise time = 0.409155 yr
Total time to crash = 0.909155 yr or 28690158 s.
I really don't have the time to scale all this to a different velocity. If lithiumdeuteride cares to provide his derivation it would be hugely appreciated. I can't quite make sense of his velocity figures; with a 24 s time difference at 2E6 m/s, the solar radius comes out to only 48000 km vs. actual value of ~350000 km.
EDIT: OK, I found the time to program a calculator for this and solve for v = 1 au/yr. My answer basically agrees with LiD's.
KE (relative to circ. orbit) is reduced by a factor of 4pi^2 thus KE = -PE0/(8pi^2).
Adding KE to PE0 and solving,
apoapsis = r0*1/(1-1/(8pi^2)) = r0*1.01282761155353
SMA = apoapsis/2
T1 = T0*(SMA/r0)^1.5
Full-distance fall time = T1/2 = 0.5*T0*(0.5*1.01282761155353)^1.5 = 0.180189014324892 yr
Partial-distance rise time (from r0 to apoapsis) = 2.57646416217077E-02 yr
Total time to impact = 0.2059536559466 yr = 6499270 s
Re: jean-de-la-lune, I think we agree that KE = -PE/2 applies to any circular orbit. In this case we have initial PE of Earth's orbit, and with 2pi au/yr we have KE of Earth's orbit, so I don't see a problem with starting the analysis from the circ. orbit. I continued with the circ. orbit basis for comparison for the 1 au/yr case because that's how I started. Lazy, I guess. But the relation between the period and the SMA is the same for any ellipse, and thus the full-distance straight-down fall time is just half the period of an ellipse with infinitesimal width.|||If you look at the derivation I cited, be sure to also look at how you expand an ellipse to calculate areas per Kepler. Here is an example (but not for this problem). http://i278.photobucket.com/al鈥?/a>
Report Abuse
|||Sorry for my eccentric behavior, again.
I suspected the second law but was to
lazy to try using it. Great question by
FGR, and many excellent answers.
Thank you, First Grade. I did learn.
Report Abuse
|||Sorry I took so long to respond. As Al said, great question and a lesson learned. This definitely goes into the toolbox.
I wonder how crow tastes. Maybe if you catch one far from a landfill...
Report Abuse
|||sorry but more information is needed for example, mass of probe and/or mass of sun in order to calculate the acceleration acting on the probe.|||If the Sun were a point mass, impact would be at approximately:
t = 6,498,620 s
But since it's not, impact instead occurs at approximately:
t = 6,498,596 s
At the time of impact, the probe is traveling at a speed of approximately:
v = 1,956,930 m/s
This solution doesn't take special relativity into account, but since the final impact velocity is only 0.006528 times light speed, the error should be small.|||Never, space is infinite and an object wouldn't fall back, it would keep going until an outside force was acted on it.|||This is a most confusing question. I withdrew my answer to the first version because I felt dissatisfied with the extrapolation to an 'ellipse' which would be a segment. And I think it is wrong and you have no right to apply Kepler's laws to such a trajectory. Mathematically, an ellipse turns into a parabola when eccentricity --%26gt;1 or it can degenerate into a pair of straight lines when you write the general conic section equation and impose certain conditions on the coefficients. But a segment, I don't see how. Physically, a trajectory through the center of force is completely different from a trajectory which has angular momentum.
Kirchway's equality KE = -PE/2 holds only because he modifies the assignement and takes 2Pi au/y velocity, which allows him to apply results valid for the earth. But of course KE=-PE/2 does not hold generally for a trajectory which ends in a finite time (the demonstration of the virial theorem does not hold) It does not hold if you take 1 au/y as initial velocity of your degenerate trajectory.
Flamechop and Magnetulsar are completely wrong since even if you had postulated a 2Pi au/y velocity, it would still be short by a factor sqrt(2) from the escape velocity. (and I assume 8th grade astronomy class is a joke)
So your answer can be found by integrating 1/sqrt[2(GM/r+C)] with C = v_0^2/2 - GM/Re first from Re to Rmax (with Rmax from C = -GM/Rmax) and then from Rmax to 0, but I don't see any way to derive it using Kepler's laws. Even if you did use them for the segment 0-Rmax seen as an ellipse of semi major axis Rmax/2, (which is not warranted in my opinion but it might be that the integral gives you the right relation for the 'half year'-you'll only know it by integrating !) you would still have to calculate the time from Re up to Rmax using integration.
Edited: I have just skimmed through dear old Lev Davidovitch and in (very) short: conservation of angular momentum (L) is equivalent to the area law which by integration yields 2m_eS = Te L with S the orbit area. Knowing it is an ellipse and having related the semi axes to G, M, L, E and m_e by using the conservation laws to solve for theta(r), you can eliminate both S and L (and m_e) and get Kepler's third law. Of course this one no longer depends on finite surface or non zero angular momentum, but you simply cannot derive it without using them.
To Sum Up: if you start from Newton, which is arguably the basis, there is no way to deduce Kepler's law for a zero angular momentum trajectory. (Besides, they are absolutely meaningless for such a trajectory) You have one and only one equation which is d^2r/dt^2 = -GM/r^2 which gives you a first (energy) integral, 1/2dr/dt-GM/r = C and by integrating that one can answer your question, but there is no way to short cut calculus.
Re: kirchway, of course I agree with KE = -PE/2 (for any periodical orbit actually) so you can use earth data to calculate initial KE in terms of Rearth by scaling the speed and then find Rmax.
My contention is that you have no right to use T^2 =kR^3 for the degenerate orbits going through the center because to demonstrate it, you need T to be a period (not a countdown time to an end) and R to be the SMA of a finite area ellipse.
This is a question of physics, not of math. Now since there is no apparent discontinuity in the formula, you can bet it is usable for the limiting case also. However you can only be sure by explicit integration (and of course, it works)
It remains that
a/ even with this somewhat dubious 'Kepler's law', you still have to perform an integration for the Re--%26gt;Rmax part (Done in your complicated formula)
b/ your final answer must be wrong..see below
LiD's remark about relativity not being important is valid only thanks to the finite solar size. Otherwise the speed grows without limit to compensate for PE --%26gt; -infinity and keep the total energy constant and finite. Then at some point one can no longer claim v/c %26lt;%26lt; 1 Because of that, LiD's time for the pointlike sun is certainly wrong and so is yours if your sun is pointlike
Actually there is an almost consistent way to consider the degenerate trajectory as the limit of an ellipse by using the angular momentum L as a parameter --%26gt;0 Keeping the energy fixed, the eccentricity--%26gt;1 (1-e^2 ~ L^2) the major axis is fixed, the minor axis--%26gt;0 (b ~ L) and the point of closest approach -%26gt;0 as L^2
The inconsistency lies in that this point is reached for theta=pi, that is, the 'other side' of the center with respect to what happens with the L=0 trajectory. Clearly, there can't exist a consistent way of treating angles when there are none in the limit.
The approximate time up calculation of AI P is beautiful but evidently wouldn't work with v=2Pi au/y|||If the probe was launched directly away from the Sun, it won't hit the Sun. Instead, it's speed would just reduce. Due to the Earth's distance from the Sun, any speed directly away from the Sun is enough to escape the Solar System. Unless it passes by an object that has enough gravity to cause the probe to change course. Then it would spiral in toward the Sun. But if the probe is traveling at 10,000s miles per hour, the only type of object in the Solar System that could cause it to change course a lot would be a giant planet. However, if it was launched from the Earth and not from a spacecraft in space not drifting, it would go in a curve anyways and not directly away from the Sun, and it would eventually begin to spiral in toward the Sun.|||If I'm understanding the question correctly, we are ignoring the movement of the sun during this period. And we have the differential equation:
r"(t) = -k/r^2
where k = 4蟺^2 au^3 / yr^2 approximately
subject to initial conditions
r(0) = 1 au
r'(0) = 1 au/yr
And we need to solve for when r = 0.004652 au (sun radius).
The difficulty is in solving this analytically. It can easily be solved numerically.
I'm getting 0.2059295 years = 75.2 days
*****
OK, there is an analytical approach. Start with
r^2 * r" = -k
Write v = r', therefore
r^2 dv/dt = r^2 dv/dr * dr/dt = -k
r^2 * v dv/dr = -k
v * dv = -k/r^2 * dr
Integrating with the initial conditions
v^2 - 1 = 2k * (1/r - 1)
v^2 = 1-2k + 2k/r
dr/dt = 鈭?(1-2k + 2k/r)
dt = 卤 dr / 鈭?(1-2k + 2k/r)
This is +ve during the ascent, and -ve during the descent.
This expression can be integrated, although it is really difficult to type out here.
dr/dt = 0 when r = 2k/(2k-1)
We can then find the time taken to reach the peak, the time taken to descend, then add them up.
I'm getting 0.2059298179 years or 75.21586599 days
What size tires are on a 1995 Ford Probe Gt? and what is a auto transmission cost for the Ford Probe?
I am planning on buying 1995 Ford Probe Gt and it needs a Auto Tranny and i need to know how much a tranny will cost to put one in cause the guy is asking 300 for it, and i need to know the size also so if the tires are messed up or half way then i will look into tires, but what are the regular size tires and wheels for the probe and what will a tranny(auto) cost for it?|||the stock tire size for probe GT is 225/50R16 you might want to check that against the inside door pillar label and 200 bucks for a good used tranny is a fair price --expect to pay about 150 to 200 to install it for labor|||Hey, I agree the tire size 225/50/16 is correct. You can get the best prices from tirerack.com. Mt bigger question is: is this a real Probe GT? I didnt know they made a GT with an automatic. I did some quick research and couldn't find a GT with an automatic. Run the VIN or do some research before you buy...If it is an automatic, these can be found new for around 1500.00 for a good one with a warranty. Dont buy junk
Where can i locate the blower motor on a 1993 Ford Probe?
I have a 1993 Ford Probe, my heater stopped working. where can i locate the blower motor on a 1993 Ford Probe?|||Under the glove box I believe
Is it feasible to cut a corvette style targa roof in my 2nd gen Probe GT?
I have a 1993 Probe GT that I want to cut a Corvette style targa into. I want the roof over the front seats to be 100% gone not like t-tops. The panel doesn't need to be reinstallable since i plan to make a vinyl panel to fit in its place. Any tips hints or suggestions are appreciated.|||i wouldn't reccommend using t tops or a targa style top. both options would weaken the unibody considerably, making the car literally twist in curves. it would also be extremely dangerous in accidents. in theory, it may be possible to strengthen the doors, quarter panels underside unibody, window frames, and several other places in the car to the point where you could use a targa style top, but it would add so much weight to the car that it would be horrible on gas and pretty slow, to boot. this would also take a great deal of engineering skill. also, to be perfectly frank, the finished result probably would not look very good.|||Sure you can.....but you will be destroying the structural integrity of the car. In other words, when they designed and built the Probe, they figured in the roof as part of the sturdiness of the vehicle on the road and in an accident. Take out the roof and a simple fender bender could bend the entire unibody (frame). You might be better off with T-tops.
Good Luck|||It's likely the body will fold. Don't know how feasible would that be...
Good Luck|||It's likely the body will fold. Don't know how feasible would that be...
What is the final speed of the probe?
A 6.5 104 kg space probe is traveling at a speed of 13000 m/s through deep space. Retrorockets are fired along the line of motion to reduce the probe's speed. The retrorockets generate a force of 5.0 105 N over a distance of 2400 km. What is the final speed of the probe?|||force= mass X acceleration. you have mass of the probe and the force of the rockets, find the acceleration. now its linear kinematics, you have initial speed, acceleration, and displacement. Vf^2=Vo^2 + 2ax seems like a nice formula to use here
Can anyone give me some information how I can buy an amp probe at a low cost in Kansas?
It is necessary for me to purchase an amp probe for cheap. Can anybody give me some recommrndation how I can do it in Kansas?|||Maybe this online shop http://seerch.com/category/1716/Amp-Mete鈥?/a> will help you to get an amp probe.|||try a electronics store, or auto parts store, make sure its for DC for cars and AC for house can be bought at any builders supply...
Where can you find the emergency brake cables for a '94 Ford Probe GT?
I have gone to two Ford Dealerships and multiple auto parts stores. No one seems to have the emergency brake cables for my probe. I NEED them. I park on a hill in gear and do not want to be doing this for very long. At this point I have no emergency brakes for my manual.|||Lol.. I wouldn't get used cables from a junk yard. I would special order them from the dealer. |||probably your best bet on that one will be the salvage yard or this website right here they might have those ,they do have lot of parts for the probes ,good luck.http://www.autopartswarehouse.com/|||I would try a junk yard or after market parts supplier. You may be able to modify another cars cable. Did Mazda make a similar model?|||try local junk yards. you can find some very good parts there for old/semi-old cars. you can find numbers and locations in the yellow pages.|||auto zone probably could order it for you. did you try to adjust the cable?
Ford Probe has two ports near the fuse box, one for summer and one for winter. Can someone explain?
In the little fuse pannel under the steering wheel on the right hand side, there is one wire and two ports for the wire to go in. One port is labeled summer, one is labeled winter. The wire is in the summer port right now, which is how it was when i got the car. What does this change when you put the wire in the winter slot? The car is a 1990 ford probe lx. Thanks|||This one goes back a way. It is for the windshield wipers. When in the summer mode, the wipers park all the way down. When the light tan-single-wire connector is moved to the winter position, the wipers park about 1.5-2 inches higher. This keeps any ice or snow buildup from inhibiting the wipers, and the ability to clean the windshield.
It was a novel idea that was only used for a couple of years. Not many people wanted to bother with moving the connector, and nobody south of the Mason-Dixon line needed to move it. I'm not certain the information ever made it into the Owner Guide. You might check. I know it was in the Technician training materials.|||It is indeed for the wiper park circuit. In winter in snow country, the wipers would be too far down to de-ice, or even break loose with a scraper.|||Go to a dealer and get the RIGHT answer
It was a novel idea that was only used for a couple of years. Not many people wanted to bother with moving the connector, and nobody south of the Mason-Dixon line needed to move it. I'm not certain the information ever made it into the Owner Guide. You might check. I know it was in the Technician training materials.|||It is indeed for the wiper park circuit. In winter in snow country, the wipers would be too far down to de-ice, or even break loose with a scraper.|||Go to a dealer and get the RIGHT answer
How much does a space probe cost?
I really need to know how much a probe costs to make and how much one costs to send out. I am having trouble finding the answer by myself. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE tell me the website you got them from. Thanks people:)|||The problem is that the cost depends upon a huge number of factors: What kind of scientific equipment is needed on the probe? What type of resources (facilities, manpower, etc). do you need to build it? And the list goes on. Probes can be in the millions or billions of dollars.|||Some cost "only" hundreds of millions, while some cost more than a Billion dollars. Launch costs have been around $100 million or more, but now SpaceX will do it for less than $60 million. A lot less if the size is small enough for the Falcon 1.
Can someone tell me what is wrong with my 1996 ford probe gt?
My ford probe runs. When it is just sitting there running its hesitates a little. We replace the spark plugs, muffler, and fuel filter we can't figure what is wrong can anyone tell please|||find out the condition of your engine by running a compression or leak-down test...|||pull the codes from the computer, if codes are there follow the code diag. If there are no codes, check and clean the MAF sensor and also check for a vaccum leak from all vaccum sources on the engine.
What can i do to cheaply increase hp in my 95 probe gt?
i have a 95 probe gt, just got a lot of new parts and a new sound system. id now like to increase performance.
so what can i start out with doing? im thinking about a CAI, or RAI. wat else can i do? it already has an aftermarket exhaust system too.|||my buddies dad has one of these. theyre pretty sweet cars. but anyways, youre already in the right direction witht he exhaust system. your next best bet would be a cold air intake, headers (if you can find them for a V6), and a high flow cat. those are pretty much the best mods and usually good for 10 - 15 extra hp. if youre looking for some more power, try swapping out the ignition system for a MSD one and some better plugs and wires. one of my favorite site for lookin for parts is www.optionsauto.com. check them out and good luck.|||Air intake, headers, turbo/super charger, use higher octane gas..etc|||Find a wrecked SVT Contour and either pick it clean or take the engine
so what can i start out with doing? im thinking about a CAI, or RAI. wat else can i do? it already has an aftermarket exhaust system too.|||my buddies dad has one of these. theyre pretty sweet cars. but anyways, youre already in the right direction witht he exhaust system. your next best bet would be a cold air intake, headers (if you can find them for a V6), and a high flow cat. those are pretty much the best mods and usually good for 10 - 15 extra hp. if youre looking for some more power, try swapping out the ignition system for a MSD one and some better plugs and wires. one of my favorite site for lookin for parts is www.optionsauto.com. check them out and good luck.|||Air intake, headers, turbo/super charger, use higher octane gas..etc|||Find a wrecked SVT Contour and either pick it clean or take the engine
How to get to fuel injectors on a 93 ford probe gt?
how do i get to the fuel injectors on a 93 ford probe gt?|||Open the hood or bonnet if you're a Brit.
How much would it cost to fix a busted valve in the head on a 1995 ford probe?
im looking at buying a 1995 ford probe, but it has a busted valve in the head, does anyone know how much it would cost to have fixed?|||When you say "busted valve", do you mean a "bent valve", or a "broken valve"?
if you meant "broken valve", i guarantee you my friend, that car is something that you do NOT want to invest your money into. a broken valve can cause and may have already caused all sorts of further damage. this can include exhaust fumes leaking into the cooling system and over-heating the engine, engine cylinder or gasket leaks causing oil to mix with coolant, broken timing belt, blown head gasket, and the list goes on. i HIGHLY recommend you stay clear of a broken valve.
if you meant "bent valve", this is generally not as serious, but is something to be very cautious of. the best way to check for a bent valve is to have a compression check done. a mechanic can do this, or you can do it yourself if you buy a compression checker. if the valve is indeed bent, the first thing you will want to find out is WHY it got bent. generally this happens because the timing belt slips or the valve has a leak from being stuck open. if this is the case, you might be looking at coughing up $300, maybe a little more, maybe a little less. but before dumping your money on fixing a bent valve, you want to get a professional inspection and make sure that this bent valve didn't cause damage to anything else.
i hope this will help you with your question and with your decision on buying or not buying the car. good luck!|||stay away from it
if you meant "broken valve", i guarantee you my friend, that car is something that you do NOT want to invest your money into. a broken valve can cause and may have already caused all sorts of further damage. this can include exhaust fumes leaking into the cooling system and over-heating the engine, engine cylinder or gasket leaks causing oil to mix with coolant, broken timing belt, blown head gasket, and the list goes on. i HIGHLY recommend you stay clear of a broken valve.
if you meant "bent valve", this is generally not as serious, but is something to be very cautious of. the best way to check for a bent valve is to have a compression check done. a mechanic can do this, or you can do it yourself if you buy a compression checker. if the valve is indeed bent, the first thing you will want to find out is WHY it got bent. generally this happens because the timing belt slips or the valve has a leak from being stuck open. if this is the case, you might be looking at coughing up $300, maybe a little more, maybe a little less. but before dumping your money on fixing a bent valve, you want to get a professional inspection and make sure that this bent valve didn't cause damage to anything else.
i hope this will help you with your question and with your decision on buying or not buying the car. good luck!|||stay away from it
Why does a cassini probe need a dish for its radio transmitter and reciever?
why does a cassini probe need a dish for its radio transmitter and reciever?
this is my science hoomework and i dont get it help?!|||I'm pretty sure they are combined on Cassini (from memory). There is not a lot of room in Cassini for radio equipment so the single is weak being transmitted and the antenna is needed to amplify the signal from Earth.
Mike Honeycutt
this is my science hoomework and i dont get it help?!|||I'm pretty sure they are combined on Cassini (from memory). There is not a lot of room in Cassini for radio equipment so the single is weak being transmitted and the antenna is needed to amplify the signal from Earth.
Mike Honeycutt
How compatible are the parts of a '92 Ford Probe with a '93 Ford Probe?
I have a 1993 Ford Probe with some problems. I was offered a 1992 Ford Probe for parts. So what are the chances of the parts I need being able to fit my car?|||When I have a question of this nature I use two resources off of the internet:
car-part.com (this helps with major components)
partsamerica. com (this covers smaller parts not found it recking yards, there is a function on some parts to see what other cars a part fits)
car-part.com (this helps with major components)
partsamerica. com (this covers smaller parts not found it recking yards, there is a function on some parts to see what other cars a part fits)
What is the telescope/probe/satellite that is flying out of the galaxy?
What is the telescope/probe/satellite that is flying out of the galaxy? I know that the Hubble only goes around earth, but i believe there is one that is flying outward.|||None. We have not yet launched a probe with sufficient speed to escape from our galaxy. The Voyager probes are right now flying out of the solar system in opposite directions. Maybe that is what you are thinking of.|||You are probably referring to the Voyager and Pioneer spacecraft. See the following link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voyager_1|||Nothing humans have launched is flying out of the galaxy.
Pioneers 10 and 11 and Voyagers 1 and 2 are all moving out of our solar system but none of them have gone even 1 light year yet. They have a LONG way to go to exit the galaxy.|||Yip, as stated above, pioneers 10 and 11 and Voyagers 1 and 2 are a long way away now, and on the way out of the solar system. None of them have actually left it though. Votager 1 is furthest away, and has passed the termination shock, as has voyager 2. We are still in contact with the Voyagers, but the pioneers now don't have enough power to communicate with us.
More recently the New Horizons spacecraft was launched in january 2006. It's going to fly past pluto, and that will also eventually leave the solar system.
Using New Horizons you can get an idea of the distances involved. New Horizons was given a huge boost of speed at launch, and is going like the clappers!
It passed the moon's orbit in 9 hours (the apollo missions took nearly 3 days to do that)
It passed Saturns orbit in 18 months (Cassini took nearly 7 years to get there by a roundabout route)
It will take 9 years to get to Pluto (Nothing's been there before)
It will take 25 years to reach the edge of the solar system...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voyager_1|||Nothing humans have launched is flying out of the galaxy.
Pioneers 10 and 11 and Voyagers 1 and 2 are all moving out of our solar system but none of them have gone even 1 light year yet. They have a LONG way to go to exit the galaxy.|||Yip, as stated above, pioneers 10 and 11 and Voyagers 1 and 2 are a long way away now, and on the way out of the solar system. None of them have actually left it though. Votager 1 is furthest away, and has passed the termination shock, as has voyager 2. We are still in contact with the Voyagers, but the pioneers now don't have enough power to communicate with us.
More recently the New Horizons spacecraft was launched in january 2006. It's going to fly past pluto, and that will also eventually leave the solar system.
Using New Horizons you can get an idea of the distances involved. New Horizons was given a huge boost of speed at launch, and is going like the clappers!
It passed the moon's orbit in 9 hours (the apollo missions took nearly 3 days to do that)
It passed Saturns orbit in 18 months (Cassini took nearly 7 years to get there by a roundabout route)
It will take 9 years to get to Pluto (Nothing's been there before)
It will take 25 years to reach the edge of the solar system...
Can someone tell me about the probe Deep Impact to Comet Tempel 1?
Can you tell me the Arrival Date, Outcome of the mission, mission patch, the instuments present, lifespan of the probe, energy source, primary method to communicate,the new data learned, the fields data can be applied to, plans to return, the cost to return if possible,and the next generation of probes or manned mission. First to help with all gets 10 points%26lt;3|||http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/deepim鈥?/a>|||You should go to google and do your own research. Isn't that the point of school? So you learn something?
Whats the best exhaust system for 1993 ford probe gt?
What would be the best loudest deep sounding performance catback exhaust for my 1993 Ford Probe GT 2.5 V6? I am thinking Borla or Greddy which ever one is better? I wish they made the Greddy Evo2 fit my car but I went to the site and the only exhaust for my car is The Greddy sp2 but I think that model is too quiet. So does anybody have any segestions on which is the better brand, and the loudest?|||You are most likely going to get allot of different answers on what people think the best exhaust is. I say it all depends on what you like. Try looking on some (Ford) forums, most have sound clips of different exhaust systems. Some manufactors like magnaflow, often have sound clips on their website as well.
Good Luck|||flowmaster is the best, 2 1/2 in tubing 40 series muffler single in dual out, HP increase and nice sound you would like
Good Luck|||flowmaster is the best, 2 1/2 in tubing 40 series muffler single in dual out, HP increase and nice sound you would like
What do you use to probe genomic DNA?
What does it mean to probe genomic DNA or when someone asks what was used to probe the genomic DNA? Does this mean what was the restriction enzyme?|||A probe is a small oligo that has a radioactive molecule that is bound to it. You can detect the molecule via audioradiography.
The basic process is called a Southern blot.
You take the genome of your organism and digest it randomly with your enzymes (or you be specific, depending on what you are planning on doing).
Then you run the sample on a polyacrylamide gel and denature DNA to ssDNA. Then transfer to nitrocelluose paper and use you probe.
Once the probe is bound to your specific DNA seqeunce, you will see a single bright band (or more than one, depending on the experiment) that the probe bound to.
This method is search for specific DNA seqeunces.
good luck.
The basic process is called a Southern blot.
You take the genome of your organism and digest it randomly with your enzymes (or you be specific, depending on what you are planning on doing).
Then you run the sample on a polyacrylamide gel and denature DNA to ssDNA. Then transfer to nitrocelluose paper and use you probe.
Once the probe is bound to your specific DNA seqeunce, you will see a single bright band (or more than one, depending on the experiment) that the probe bound to.
This method is search for specific DNA seqeunces.
good luck.
A probe is ejected upward from a lunar module 3000 ft above the surface of the moon.?
After 10 seconds, the probe is 2980 ft above the lunar surface. After 20 seconds, it is 2420 feet above the lunar surface.
A) Determine the position function for the distance of the probe above the surface at any time
B) How many seconds will it take for the probe to reach the lunar surface?|||A)
at t=0, h = 3000
at t=10, h = 2980
at t=20, h = 2420
in the 1st 10 sec, the probe fell 20 ft
in the 2nd 10 sec, the probe fell 560 ft
Let us assume that the probe is in a parabolic fall. Therefore, the function for the height is
f(t) = a1*t^2 + a2*t + a3
at
f(0) = 0 + 0 + a3 = 3000
So a3 = 3000
Then,
f(10) = a1*(100) + a2*10 + 3000 = 2980
f(20) = a1*(400) + a2*20 + 3000 = 2420
Using f(10) and f(20) we have 2 equations with 2 unkowns, a1 and a2. Reducing them further yeilds:
f(10) = 100*a1 + 10*a2 = -20
f(20) = 400*a1 + 20*a2 = -580
I'll solve this using matricies. If you need another method, you can do that by hand...
A =
[100 10]
[400 20]
b =
[-20 ]
[-580]
x =
[a1]
[a2]
A*x = b
x = A^-1*b
x =
[-2.7]
[25.0]
so
f(t) = -2.7*t^2 + 25*t + 3000
B)
Set f(t) = 0 and solve for t
-2.7*t^2 + 25*t + 3000 = 0
t = 38.3 sec
A) Determine the position function for the distance of the probe above the surface at any time
B) How many seconds will it take for the probe to reach the lunar surface?|||A)
at t=0, h = 3000
at t=10, h = 2980
at t=20, h = 2420
in the 1st 10 sec, the probe fell 20 ft
in the 2nd 10 sec, the probe fell 560 ft
Let us assume that the probe is in a parabolic fall. Therefore, the function for the height is
f(t) = a1*t^2 + a2*t + a3
at
f(0) = 0 + 0 + a3 = 3000
So a3 = 3000
Then,
f(10) = a1*(100) + a2*10 + 3000 = 2980
f(20) = a1*(400) + a2*20 + 3000 = 2420
Using f(10) and f(20) we have 2 equations with 2 unkowns, a1 and a2. Reducing them further yeilds:
f(10) = 100*a1 + 10*a2 = -20
f(20) = 400*a1 + 20*a2 = -580
I'll solve this using matricies. If you need another method, you can do that by hand...
A =
[100 10]
[400 20]
b =
[-20 ]
[-580]
x =
[a1]
[a2]
A*x = b
x = A^-1*b
x =
[-2.7]
[25.0]
so
f(t) = -2.7*t^2 + 25*t + 3000
B)
Set f(t) = 0 and solve for t
-2.7*t^2 + 25*t + 3000 = 0
t = 38.3 sec
Where can i find wiring diagrams or fuse box diagrams for my 89 probe?
i was wondering Where i can find wiring diagrams or fuse box diagrams for my 89 probe i googled and cant find it i need to find the ignition fuse any help?|||Chilton Manual at your local library|||THERE ARE NONE.....
GO TO THE LIBRARY, ITS FREE.|||Auto zone or O'Reillys auto parts stores carry books.
Good Luck.|||haynes manual, buy em at auto zone
GO TO THE LIBRARY, ITS FREE.|||Auto zone or O'Reillys auto parts stores carry books.
Good Luck.|||haynes manual, buy em at auto zone
How do you know if timing is bad on a 90 ford probe?
i have a 90 ford probe and it tries to crank over just wont start i changed the fuel filter, spark plugs and wires, and ignition coil. and it still wont start. how do u tell if the timing is bad? do you have any other suggestions?|||The Probes distributors were notorious for going bad, I'd start there and have it checked out!
What is your opinion of gravity probe B ?
Use the Yahoo search with the key words 'gravity probe B',you can find out more informations about it.|||Gravity Probe B will confirm Einstein's prediction on spacetime curvature near Earth, and thereby the stress-energy tensor (the distribution, and especially the motion, of matter) in and near Earth.
Initial results has already confirmed the expected geodetic effect to an accuracy of about 1%. However, the expected frame-dragging signal has been measured in magnitude equal to the current noise level; hence, further data analysis will be required.
Initial results has already confirmed the expected geodetic effect to an accuracy of about 1%. However, the expected frame-dragging signal has been measured in magnitude equal to the current noise level; hence, further data analysis will be required.
Is this is technically feasible method of getting a probe to Proxima Centauri?
Set up a particle accelerator in space, perhaps on the Moon. Use it to fire a beam of particles (neutrons?) towards Proxima Centauri at close to the speed of light. Place the probe (which might only weigh about as much as a golf ball) in the beam. The collision of the beam particles with the probe gradually accelerates the probe to close to the speed of light, and the probe rapidly covers the distance to Proxima Centauri, taking four or five years to get there.
The probe would be able to steer itself into the beam, if it found that it had parted company with the beam.
This project would obviously be highly expensive, but would it be technically feasible? Could the technical difficulties be overcome?|||Cool idea but its not the way forward (no pun intended) WE have to og and come back, and instead of wasting time sending probes then waiting another 30 years...we should send a manned craft... just float it into space and get as much feedback as poss. A condemned man maybe or two (for company).... we know they wont come back but at least they would be free... and we can monitor the effects|||Why not put the particle accelerator on the probe? No problems with keeping in the beam - and you have something to slow you down with.|||Maybe....|||One problem - is there going to be a neutrino beam at the other end to slow it down?
Also we dont have a way to fire neutrinos and if they did it wouldnt do much because neutrinos interact so weakly with matter. Nice idea but you might need to go back to the drawing board.|||Well, it's theoretically possible. But, it would rely on making a probe out of Indesctructium... making the probe out of any real material would result in it being vaporized by the enormous energy of the neutron beam.
Plus, once the probe got to proxima centauri, it would spend maybe an hour in the vicinity of the star... as it has nothing to slow it down again.
So, basically.... not technically feasible. Interesting idea though.|||How would it know when to stop ?|||your idea does not start off very well, because (1) you cannot accelerate neutrons since they're not charged (accelerators that produce neutrons do so by accelerating protons and shooting them at a target such that they are absorbed by nuclei which then re-emit neutrons after some nuclear process), and (2) neutrons interact weakly with matter since they're not charged.
but even supposing you had protons, it would be highly complex - source of protons, focussing of beam, etc.
a much cheaper idea would be to simply set a solar sail on your probe, this could potentially accelerate it to high speeds. Not to the point of reaching Proxima Centauri in 4 to 5 years, but maybe "just" 50 to 100 years, which wouldn't be so bad.
in theory we could build this today. Too bad so little R%26amp;D money goes to solar sails.
(following your comment) I repeat, why bother to build a huge accelerator, when you alread have photons out there, for free, that could do the job? It's a bit as if Columbus came to see you and said he thought he could go to the Indies using the wind to fill his sails, and you insisted on building a huge wind-making machine on shore ;-)|||The real question is "Why would you want to send a golf ball to Proxima Centauri and have it just wiz past at near the speed of light?|||In theory it would work, but in practice the problem is keeping a beam of particles collimated for that distance.|||I believe there is a space time rupture under your bed. Climb into it and say Proxima Centuri 5 times. You'll be there in 20 seconds at most. Don't drink the water when you're there! Hope this helps?
The probe would be able to steer itself into the beam, if it found that it had parted company with the beam.
This project would obviously be highly expensive, but would it be technically feasible? Could the technical difficulties be overcome?|||Cool idea but its not the way forward (no pun intended) WE have to og and come back, and instead of wasting time sending probes then waiting another 30 years...we should send a manned craft... just float it into space and get as much feedback as poss. A condemned man maybe or two (for company).... we know they wont come back but at least they would be free... and we can monitor the effects|||Why not put the particle accelerator on the probe? No problems with keeping in the beam - and you have something to slow you down with.|||Maybe....|||One problem - is there going to be a neutrino beam at the other end to slow it down?
Also we dont have a way to fire neutrinos and if they did it wouldnt do much because neutrinos interact so weakly with matter. Nice idea but you might need to go back to the drawing board.|||Well, it's theoretically possible. But, it would rely on making a probe out of Indesctructium... making the probe out of any real material would result in it being vaporized by the enormous energy of the neutron beam.
Plus, once the probe got to proxima centauri, it would spend maybe an hour in the vicinity of the star... as it has nothing to slow it down again.
So, basically.... not technically feasible. Interesting idea though.|||How would it know when to stop ?|||your idea does not start off very well, because (1) you cannot accelerate neutrons since they're not charged (accelerators that produce neutrons do so by accelerating protons and shooting them at a target such that they are absorbed by nuclei which then re-emit neutrons after some nuclear process), and (2) neutrons interact weakly with matter since they're not charged.
but even supposing you had protons, it would be highly complex - source of protons, focussing of beam, etc.
a much cheaper idea would be to simply set a solar sail on your probe, this could potentially accelerate it to high speeds. Not to the point of reaching Proxima Centauri in 4 to 5 years, but maybe "just" 50 to 100 years, which wouldn't be so bad.
in theory we could build this today. Too bad so little R%26amp;D money goes to solar sails.
(following your comment) I repeat, why bother to build a huge accelerator, when you alread have photons out there, for free, that could do the job? It's a bit as if Columbus came to see you and said he thought he could go to the Indies using the wind to fill his sails, and you insisted on building a huge wind-making machine on shore ;-)|||The real question is "Why would you want to send a golf ball to Proxima Centauri and have it just wiz past at near the speed of light?|||In theory it would work, but in practice the problem is keeping a beam of particles collimated for that distance.|||I believe there is a space time rupture under your bed. Climb into it and say Proxima Centuri 5 times. You'll be there in 20 seconds at most. Don't drink the water when you're there! Hope this helps?
Can I use a periodontal probe on myself?
I have mild peridontitis and want to measure my pockets on a regular basis. Can I buy a probe and use it on myself?|||I really wouldn't suggest it personally. you have very delicate ligaments around your tooth which hold the it in place.
Probing them on a regular basis can damage these ligaments and aggravate your periodontists. Periodontists is a loss of this attachment of the ligaments, frequent pressure could prevent them from healing, especially if you push too deep.|||You can, but it will not be nearly as easy as for you hygienst or dentist. Your going to have to be careful as to not poke to far into your gums too.. while looking in a mirror.
Probing them on a regular basis can damage these ligaments and aggravate your periodontists. Periodontists is a loss of this attachment of the ligaments, frequent pressure could prevent them from healing, especially if you push too deep.|||You can, but it will not be nearly as easy as for you hygienst or dentist. Your going to have to be careful as to not poke to far into your gums too.. while looking in a mirror.
Where is the fuel filter located on a 1993 ford probe?
i race a 93 ford probe but im new to the 4 cylinder engine. i work on my dads racecar which is a 75 chevy nova so its completely different. all we know is that it is somewhere located under the car but we have looked and cant seem to find it ... we need to know as soon as possible because i race in a few days and it definately needs to be changed before i go back out
thanks!|||Down below the brake master cylinder. I had to remove the front drivers side tire to get to it. Its a tight job.|||prob in the wheel well|||the fuel filter is located between the air filter and the fire wall and down|||Ford usually puts their fuel filters under the car, near the driver's side door. You probably will need a special tool ' little plastic sleeve' to release the clip. It is available at any Auto Parts Store.|||Follow fuel lines path from tank ,under car up to motor somewhere is in line canister type filter.My guess is under car either back near tank or mid way through the body.
thanks!|||Down below the brake master cylinder. I had to remove the front drivers side tire to get to it. Its a tight job.|||prob in the wheel well|||the fuel filter is located between the air filter and the fire wall and down|||Ford usually puts their fuel filters under the car, near the driver's side door. You probably will need a special tool ' little plastic sleeve' to release the clip. It is available at any Auto Parts Store.|||Follow fuel lines path from tank ,under car up to motor somewhere is in line canister type filter.My guess is under car either back near tank or mid way through the body.
Where can I get a dataset of the Voyager 1 probe positions?
I am wondering if there is any datasets out there that can provide me with a list of equatorial coordinate (ra/dec) postions of the Voyager 1 probe since it's launch?|||Dude, if this kind of question comes up a lot with you, then you seriously need to learn how to reduce Keplerian orbital elements to a state vector and then do the coordinate transformations to translate from heliocentric to geocentric coordinates, and rotate from ecliptic to celestial coordinates. It isn't hard to learn at all. Just a short little procedure. I've never been a professional astronomer and I can do it, which just proves how easy it is.
Here's how to do the calculation for Pioneer 10. You can look up Voyager 1's orbital elements for yourself.
Pioneer 10, orbital elements.
a = −6.93850 AU
e = 1.72923
i = 3.143 degrees
Ω = 331.996 degrees
ω = 346.732 degrees
T = JD 2442017.13
Hyperbolic mean anomaly.
M = 0.01720209895 (t − T) √[1/(−a)³]
Hyperbolic eccentric anomaly.
u = 0
Repeat...
. u₀ = u
. f₀ = e sinh u₀ − u₀ − M
. f₁ = e cosh u₀ − 1
. f₂ = e sinh u₀
. f₃ = e cosh u₀
. d₁ = −f₀ / f₁
. d₂ = −f₀ / [ f₁ + d₁ f₂/2 ]
. d₃ = −f₀ / [ f₁ + d₁ f₂/2 + d₂² f₃/6 ]
. u = u₀ + d₃
Until |u − u₀| %26lt; 1E-14
True anomaly.
Q = arccos { (e − cosh u) / (e cosh u − 1) }
Heliocentric distance.
r = a (1 − e cosh u)
Canonical position vector.
x''' = r cos Q
y''' = r sin Q
Rotate by argument of the perihelion.
x'' = x''' cos ω − y''' sin ω
y'' = x''' sin ω + y''' cos ω
Rotate by inclination.
x' = x''
y' = y'' cos i
z' = y'' sin i
Rotate by longitude of ascending node to get...
The heliocentric position in ecliptic coordinates.
x = x' cos Ω − y' sin Ω
y = x' sin Ω + y' cos Ω
z = z'
Heliocentric longitude.
λ = (180/π) { arctan( y / x ) + Δ } degrees
if x%26gt;0 and y%26gt;0 then Δ=0
if x%26gt;0 and y%26lt;0 then Δ=2π
if x%26lt;0 then Δ=π
Heliocentric latitude.
β = (180/π) { arcsin( z / r ) } degrees
Some of the details are different for elliptical orbits, but the objects you're interested in are in hyperbolic trajectories, so that's the procedure I am showing.|||This is the ephemeris for the droid you are looking for.
http://vho.nasa.gov/mission/voyager/1/ep…
http://vho.nasa.gov/vxo/metadata.php?id=…
http://ipnpr.jpl.nasa.gov/progress_repor… (PDF)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voyager_1
http://voyager.jpl.nasa.gov/
Voyager 1 is heading toward (2000): RA 17:28, Dec +12°
Here's how to do the calculation for Pioneer 10. You can look up Voyager 1's orbital elements for yourself.
Pioneer 10, orbital elements.
a = −6.93850 AU
e = 1.72923
i = 3.143 degrees
Ω = 331.996 degrees
ω = 346.732 degrees
T = JD 2442017.13
Hyperbolic mean anomaly.
M = 0.01720209895 (t − T) √[1/(−a)³]
Hyperbolic eccentric anomaly.
u = 0
Repeat...
. u₀ = u
. f₀ = e sinh u₀ − u₀ − M
. f₁ = e cosh u₀ − 1
. f₂ = e sinh u₀
. f₃ = e cosh u₀
. d₁ = −f₀ / f₁
. d₂ = −f₀ / [ f₁ + d₁ f₂/2 ]
. d₃ = −f₀ / [ f₁ + d₁ f₂/2 + d₂² f₃/6 ]
. u = u₀ + d₃
Until |u − u₀| %26lt; 1E-14
True anomaly.
Q = arccos { (e − cosh u) / (e cosh u − 1) }
Heliocentric distance.
r = a (1 − e cosh u)
Canonical position vector.
x''' = r cos Q
y''' = r sin Q
Rotate by argument of the perihelion.
x'' = x''' cos ω − y''' sin ω
y'' = x''' sin ω + y''' cos ω
Rotate by inclination.
x' = x''
y' = y'' cos i
z' = y'' sin i
Rotate by longitude of ascending node to get...
The heliocentric position in ecliptic coordinates.
x = x' cos Ω − y' sin Ω
y = x' sin Ω + y' cos Ω
z = z'
Heliocentric longitude.
λ = (180/π) { arctan( y / x ) + Δ } degrees
if x%26gt;0 and y%26gt;0 then Δ=0
if x%26gt;0 and y%26lt;0 then Δ=2π
if x%26lt;0 then Δ=π
Heliocentric latitude.
β = (180/π) { arcsin( z / r ) } degrees
Some of the details are different for elliptical orbits, but the objects you're interested in are in hyperbolic trajectories, so that's the procedure I am showing.|||This is the ephemeris for the droid you are looking for.
http://vho.nasa.gov/mission/voyager/1/ep…
http://vho.nasa.gov/vxo/metadata.php?id=…
http://ipnpr.jpl.nasa.gov/progress_repor… (PDF)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voyager_1
http://voyager.jpl.nasa.gov/
Voyager 1 is heading toward (2000): RA 17:28, Dec +12°
Can I connect a coaxial cable directly to the output probe of a magnetron?
Can I connect a coaxial cable directly to the output probe of a magnetron for transmission of wave in to cavity for 2.45 ghz frenquence|||I don't think so. The magnetron generates radio waves (like an antenna), so you use wave guides to direct them around. Coaxial cable directs electrical signals around, not electromagnetic radiation.
What is the liquid inside a temperature probe in an oven?
in our electric oven, the temp. probe came loose from the wire lead to the thermostat and a liquid drained from the probe, Is this liquid harmless?|||Hi !
This is Mercury , a metal that is liguid at room temperature . Yes , it IS a health hazard !
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercury_(el鈥?/a>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermometer
=^,,^=|||The good news is, you can replace that part.
Buy a new Oven temperature probe online here:
http://www.apwagner.com/index.php?main_p鈥?/a>
This is Mercury , a metal that is liguid at room temperature . Yes , it IS a health hazard !
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercury_(el鈥?/a>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermometer
=^,,^=|||The good news is, you can replace that part.
Buy a new Oven temperature probe online here:
http://www.apwagner.com/index.php?main_p鈥?/a>
Is a buoyant Jupiter middle atmosphere probe possible?
Something to hover below the cloud tops where the ambient density is so great that the probe displaces more of Jupiter's atmosphere than it weighs. What might such a probe be made of? How might it be designed? In what way would data be transmitted to a relay satellite in orbit?|||It is possible, and is being worked on.|||It has been suggested in the past. The engineering involved would be
monumental, though. Not to mention the cost!
monumental, though. Not to mention the cost!
What are advantages of buying a 1989 Ford Probe?
I want to buy an '89 Probe but people have been telling me that they have lots of problems and wanted to know if that was true?|||It depends on the engine and transmission. It was also the first year for the car so it did have some issues. Parts are becoming more scarce. Only advantage, looked cute?|||They are junk. There are no advantages to buying a Probe, unless sitting on the side of the road watching cars go by is an advantage. I bought a 1988 Mazda MX-6 new (same engine and chassis, both built in Michigan in the same plant) and had nothing but problems with it. However, the MX-6s that were made in Japan had far fewer problems. No Probes were made in Japan.|||There are very few advantages, except for gas mileage and looks, perhaps. Parts are insanely expensive for that car, and they always break. $600 for a distributor, $1200 for an a/c compressor...just ludicrous. Buy something else....|||I had a `93 and I loved it til it reached 60K miles. After that it cost too much to keep any longer.|||they are fule efficient and that's about it. my car is 3 years newer and I'M having trouble finding parts. That thing breaks down, you're in trouble. '89 was also the first year for the car, so it was basically a prototype with a few bugs to work out.|||I had a 1989 from the day it rolled off the assembly line until May 2002. It was the perfect car, always reliable, only died once when the alternator stopped generating and it was 10 at that point anyway. I had the digital dash and an auto trans. The body on mine never rusted, and the headlamps still moved. But do not count on being able to do repairs yourself. The car is not very maintenance friendly, and the engine compartment is very tightly packed. You may have to recruit help to even change the oil, as I did. Also, MAKE SURE THE HEADLIGHTS go up and down. Sometimes they stick, and its not good if they stick down!
Why is my over drive light on and wont work on my 93 ford probe?
I bought a 93 ford probe and the o.d. light is on and flashing on and off all the time, It don't work and my car is getting bad gas mileage! anybody know why and what could be the problem?|||I had the same problem. Unfortunately, you`re going to have to get used to no o/d. I never got mine fixed, but I was told it was a sign of a needed rebuild.|||It could be either the transmission itself, or some kind of overdrive module, or sensor. I'm not a big Ford man, so sorry that's all I got for you! Good luck.
A space probe is traveling at a speed of 15000 m/s through deep space. What is the final speed of?
A 5.00x10^4 kg space probe is traveling at a speed of 15000 m/s through deep space. Retrorockets are fired along the line of motion to reduce the probe's speed. The retrorockets generate a force of 4.00x10^5 N over a distance of 2700 km. What is the final speed of the probe?|||Work = Force * distance
That is equal to the change in kinetic energy. Calculate the initial KE, subtract off the work done, set that equal to final KE.
That is equal to the change in kinetic energy. Calculate the initial KE, subtract off the work done, set that equal to final KE.
Which space probe would yeild the most interesting results?
Would a probe to Europa or to Enceladus be more productive?|||I think both are good candidates (I would also Include Titan)
but I think out of those two, Europa would yield better results, even though both are though to have a liquid ocean under there Ice, Europa's ice will be easier to dig through, since it is thinner.|||I like Europa for the higher possbility of life.|||The most cited space borne instrument is Spitzer.
If you are talking about deep space probes I would say Cassini.
but I think out of those two, Europa would yield better results, even though both are though to have a liquid ocean under there Ice, Europa's ice will be easier to dig through, since it is thinner.|||I like Europa for the higher possbility of life.|||The most cited space borne instrument is Spitzer.
If you are talking about deep space probes I would say Cassini.
Could a probe use Comet Halley for gravity assist?
Could a probe use Comet Halley for gravity assist? I know the comet is light and doesn't have much gravity, but when it's near Earth it's going very fast so wouldn't that be useful?|||In principle yes. Close to the earth it goes fast, of the order of 40 km/s. So if your probe approaches on the right trajectory it would be a big help.
However.... Halley's comet approaches the Sun only every 75 years. The Earth, Halley *and* the target of the probe must be in just the correct positions to make it worthwhile. Secondly, a comet approaching the Sun is heavily outgassing. That's what creates the tail after all. It is in fact surrounded by a dust cloud, very dangerous for your probe.|||The speed combines with the lightness to create the problem. Because it is so light, the gravity effect would be very minor and so would have moved away from the probe before gravity could accelerate it enough to catch up to the comet (so it would be a small effect for a short time).
In addition the speed of the comet has no impact on the gravity energy that it outputs.
My suggestion involves a lasso made of NASA modified bungee cable and texas billionnaire rancher crazy enough to fund such an crazy project.|||Technically, yes.
But even though halley's velocity is great, to my understanding, the miniscule gravity wont transfer very much of that momentum to the probe.
However.... Halley's comet approaches the Sun only every 75 years. The Earth, Halley *and* the target of the probe must be in just the correct positions to make it worthwhile. Secondly, a comet approaching the Sun is heavily outgassing. That's what creates the tail after all. It is in fact surrounded by a dust cloud, very dangerous for your probe.|||The speed combines with the lightness to create the problem. Because it is so light, the gravity effect would be very minor and so would have moved away from the probe before gravity could accelerate it enough to catch up to the comet (so it would be a small effect for a short time).
In addition the speed of the comet has no impact on the gravity energy that it outputs.
My suggestion involves a lasso made of NASA modified bungee cable and texas billionnaire rancher crazy enough to fund such an crazy project.|||Technically, yes.
But even though halley's velocity is great, to my understanding, the miniscule gravity wont transfer very much of that momentum to the probe.
Saturday, November 19, 2011
What did the messenger probe to mercury do?
I'm doing this project about a probe; the messenger. Please help me because this project is due tomorrow! I need a website telling what the probe did, and where it is now! PLEASE! you can leave more then one website but if you write somehting down please leave a web.! thanks if you leave something! if not, you suck. lol|||it did the same as all the probes on startrek the next generation/////////it probed/ck nasa
What is the final speed of the probe?
A 5.5 x 10^4 kg space probe is traveling at a speed of 15000 m/s through deep space. Retrorockets are fired along the line of motion to reduce the probe's speed. The retrorockets generate a force of 3.5 x 10^5 N over a distance of 2500 km. What is the final speed of the probe?|||F d = 1/2m ( V1^2 - V2^2)
solve for V2
solve for V2
In order to identify a specific restriction fragment using a probe, what must be done?
A. The probe must be hybridized with the fragment.
B. The fragments must be separated by electrophoresis.
C. The fragments must be treated with heat or chemicals to separate the strands of the double helix.
D. The fragments must be separated by electrophoresis or must be treated with heat or chemicals to separate the strands of the double helix
E. The fragments must be separated by electrophoresis, treated with heat or chemicals to separate the strands of the double helix, or the probe must be hybridized with the fragment|||I would choose answer E, but shouldn't the "or" after "double helix" be an "and"?
B. The fragments must be separated by electrophoresis.
C. The fragments must be treated with heat or chemicals to separate the strands of the double helix.
D. The fragments must be separated by electrophoresis or must be treated with heat or chemicals to separate the strands of the double helix
E. The fragments must be separated by electrophoresis, treated with heat or chemicals to separate the strands of the double helix, or the probe must be hybridized with the fragment|||I would choose answer E, but shouldn't the "or" after "double helix" be an "and"?
Does anyone have the slightest idea of how much the Vega 1 space probe cost ?
I have looked everywhere for the cost of this space probe It was launched December 15 1984. I need the cost for a report and it would be extremely helpful for any information regarding the cost if you do find something can I have the website or other source so I can cite it? Please help me, thank you!|||This is going to be a tough one.
Even if you could find the budget in rubles, there is no meaningful conversion to anything else, because the ruble wasn't a convertible currency in Soviet times.
The Soviet Union just didn't publish these things. You might be able to find numbers in journals of that era, like Pravda (available on microfilm at any decent university library) or Kril'ya Rodiny ("Wings of the Motherland" - cool title!). A smattering of Russian is handy for space geeks...
Addendum: the other thing you could do is what western analysts did all the time during the Cold War: compare the size and complexity of the Soviet project with known western projects, and estimate from there.
Even if you could find the budget in rubles, there is no meaningful conversion to anything else, because the ruble wasn't a convertible currency in Soviet times.
The Soviet Union just didn't publish these things. You might be able to find numbers in journals of that era, like Pravda (available on microfilm at any decent university library) or Kril'ya Rodiny ("Wings of the Motherland" - cool title!). A smattering of Russian is handy for space geeks...
Addendum: the other thing you could do is what western analysts did all the time during the Cold War: compare the size and complexity of the Soviet project with known western projects, and estimate from there.
Do i need a probe and connectivity kit for my lite on drive?
Hello,i want to flash my lite on drive in my xbox 360 model 74850c DG-16D2S but i don't want to buy a ck3 connectivity kit or probe.Can i flash this drive without the probe?|||I have found you a website that tells you if you need the probe and connectivity kit for any drive make/model go to http://xboxtree.blogspot.com/ and find the page that says flashing lite on drive without probe.
Is there a space probe on its way to Europa right now?
I watched this thing on TV that said they were going to send a probe to Jupiters moon Europa to check for underwater life, but the documentary was a repeat and I think it was made in the late 90's, so did they send a probe there?
Or will they be sending one? And when will it get there?|||No, there is not yet a probe going to Europa. A prototype underwater explorer, Endurance, is being tested on Earth in preparation for sending one to Europa.
The Jupiter Icy Moons Orbiter (JIMO) has been cancelled. It was a proposed mission to orbit three of the Galilean satellites, Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto, which may have subsurface oceans and possibly the ingredients for life.|||I think I know the show that you mean. They were talking about the Jupiter Icy Moons Orbiter (JIMO) which has been canceled since the making of that show.|||It was made either in the 90's or early 00's cuz i remember seeing that aswel, i might be mistaken but the probe was canceled due to the risk of contaminating Europa's possible eco system.
Or will they be sending one? And when will it get there?|||No, there is not yet a probe going to Europa. A prototype underwater explorer, Endurance, is being tested on Earth in preparation for sending one to Europa.
The Jupiter Icy Moons Orbiter (JIMO) has been cancelled. It was a proposed mission to orbit three of the Galilean satellites, Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto, which may have subsurface oceans and possibly the ingredients for life.|||I think I know the show that you mean. They were talking about the Jupiter Icy Moons Orbiter (JIMO) which has been canceled since the making of that show.|||It was made either in the 90's or early 00's cuz i remember seeing that aswel, i might be mistaken but the probe was canceled due to the risk of contaminating Europa's possible eco system.
How do I check the transmission fluid in a 1994 Ford Probe?
How do I check the transmission fluid in a 1994 Ford Probe?|||Engine running, pull orange dip stick and read the level.
What are 3 possible questions a Venus in Scorpio guy would ask to probe a potential mate?
Posted this question again. Hope to gather enough opinions since Venus in Scorpio are a puzzle to me. What are 3 possible questions a Venus in Scorpio guy would ask to probe a potential mate? Give your insights as well on why he would ask these type of questions.|||Im a Venus in Scorpio FEMALE...lol..
But Im a Libran Girl firstly...
Im very much to what it says a Venus In Scorpio is and my Libra gives it some class... lol
my bf is venus in scorpio too... so ill tell u what he asked me... :)
1. Would it be okay if i come along to that party ur going to on Saturday? I wanna be there with You... (actually he just wants to see which other guy is checking u out n if u r looking around too... but being venus in scorp myself... i was checkin if nyone was looking at him... He is obsessive and possesive...)
2. Why do you love me? Why Have i fallen in love with you? (stares into ur eyes like a lunatic) U Intrigue me sooo much... I just....*he sighs*.... and he expects a deep reply too... which i say...
I love you becuase you are like me...(and his eyes light up and he pierces ur eyes back...) or id say, we were just meant to be... and give him a piercing look... its meant to be a a deep, dark sensual look! and then he'll reply you with his eyes...., and he'll seduce you to bed... lol...
3. I wanna show you how much I love you... I want it to be me and you and i wanna feel ur soul.... is that okay with you hon? and he'll question u with his eyes... (theres no going back now or u'll break his heart...and once u have... in two days, he'll make it a plan to rape u and make u his for life if he is insane about u that is... )
so u look him back in the eyes, and say... "I wanna show you too.., Love me......." .. and ull make him feel like the KING! He will love you sooo much...
depends on ur sign... if ur a venus in scorpio... ull love the intense passion and love.. but if ur not, u mite not like it soo much....
hope this helps love! :)|||never dated a venus in scorpio (i dont think) but my dads and my sister both have it.... sooo yeaaah i'm used to dealing with those. there not gonna ask you straight out what they REALLY wanna know from you. think of it as between the lines of casual conversation using soft manipulation. but dont think of it as scary, cause honestly there the most deeply loving sweethearts along with taraus, pisces, libra, and leo venus. quesions they would ask? 1%26gt; your past relationships, family, marriage, kids whatever.. but dont worry there not judging. 2%26gt; have you ever been in love... love is what they do take seriously above anything else so they gotta know what level you on. 3%26gt; wanted your deepest darkest taboo secrets... yes when you start to spill things like that to them, the bond get greater of course but the greatest thing about it is they'll protect it and never tell a soul while loving you more for feeling that comfortable with them.|||...first, he will want to know what your (mother) looks like... because, in time...that's what YOU are going to look like ! (then)...he'll want to know do you like to "swallow"... because that's what he really wants from you ! (and) finally... can you just make him a sandwich when he's done and don't worry about all the other "crap" !|||Well i'm a venus in scorpio female, and i would defo ask about their past, as i am very suspicious and i want to know deeply about the background of my potential mate,|||Ahaha at that libra chick xDD you're a freak. you're actually someone I'd be friends with though.
But Im a Libran Girl firstly...
Im very much to what it says a Venus In Scorpio is and my Libra gives it some class... lol
my bf is venus in scorpio too... so ill tell u what he asked me... :)
1. Would it be okay if i come along to that party ur going to on Saturday? I wanna be there with You... (actually he just wants to see which other guy is checking u out n if u r looking around too... but being venus in scorp myself... i was checkin if nyone was looking at him... He is obsessive and possesive...)
2. Why do you love me? Why Have i fallen in love with you? (stares into ur eyes like a lunatic) U Intrigue me sooo much... I just....*he sighs*.... and he expects a deep reply too... which i say...
I love you becuase you are like me...(and his eyes light up and he pierces ur eyes back...) or id say, we were just meant to be... and give him a piercing look... its meant to be a a deep, dark sensual look! and then he'll reply you with his eyes...., and he'll seduce you to bed... lol...
3. I wanna show you how much I love you... I want it to be me and you and i wanna feel ur soul.... is that okay with you hon? and he'll question u with his eyes... (theres no going back now or u'll break his heart...and once u have... in two days, he'll make it a plan to rape u and make u his for life if he is insane about u that is... )
so u look him back in the eyes, and say... "I wanna show you too.., Love me......." .. and ull make him feel like the KING! He will love you sooo much...
depends on ur sign... if ur a venus in scorpio... ull love the intense passion and love.. but if ur not, u mite not like it soo much....
hope this helps love! :)|||never dated a venus in scorpio (i dont think) but my dads and my sister both have it.... sooo yeaaah i'm used to dealing with those. there not gonna ask you straight out what they REALLY wanna know from you. think of it as between the lines of casual conversation using soft manipulation. but dont think of it as scary, cause honestly there the most deeply loving sweethearts along with taraus, pisces, libra, and leo venus. quesions they would ask? 1%26gt; your past relationships, family, marriage, kids whatever.. but dont worry there not judging. 2%26gt; have you ever been in love... love is what they do take seriously above anything else so they gotta know what level you on. 3%26gt; wanted your deepest darkest taboo secrets... yes when you start to spill things like that to them, the bond get greater of course but the greatest thing about it is they'll protect it and never tell a soul while loving you more for feeling that comfortable with them.|||...first, he will want to know what your (mother) looks like... because, in time...that's what YOU are going to look like ! (then)...he'll want to know do you like to "swallow"... because that's what he really wants from you ! (and) finally... can you just make him a sandwich when he's done and don't worry about all the other "crap" !|||Well i'm a venus in scorpio female, and i would defo ask about their past, as i am very suspicious and i want to know deeply about the background of my potential mate,|||Ahaha at that libra chick xDD you're a freak. you're actually someone I'd be friends with though.
What are 3 possible questions a Venus in Scorpio guy would ask to probe a potential mate?
Posted this again for more info. What are 3 possible questions a Venus in Scorpio guy would ask to probe a potential mate? Give your insights as well on why he would ask these type of questions.|||-Is she to be taken serious/ is she worth it?
This because Scorpio Venus well we like to give it 1000% percent in our relationships and if the girl isn't worth it (she's all free for all-ish) then no
-Will she be loyal?
We need to know and if she is worth it we want to make sure she will be loyal and give in to the relationship as much as we will
-Is she willing to be possessed?
By this I mean will she want to give up many of the things to make sure jealousy or insecurity doesn't start to pop up in our heads
-is she manipulative or will she play mind games??
We just simply don't like it
-Is she true to herself?
If we are interested it will be for someone who isn't like others and is herself
This because Scorpio Venus well we like to give it 1000% percent in our relationships and if the girl isn't worth it (she's all free for all-ish) then no
-Will she be loyal?
We need to know and if she is worth it we want to make sure she will be loyal and give in to the relationship as much as we will
-Is she willing to be possessed?
By this I mean will she want to give up many of the things to make sure jealousy or insecurity doesn't start to pop up in our heads
-is she manipulative or will she play mind games??
We just simply don't like it
-Is she true to herself?
If we are interested it will be for someone who isn't like others and is herself
What are 3 possible questions a Venus in Scorpio guy would ask to probe a potential mate?
Posted this again for more info. What are 3 possible questions a Venus in Scorpio guy would ask to probe a potential mate?|||If you mean by mate someone who they would like to start a long/deep relationship with then I guess he would ask about how many lovers they have had, what there last relationship was like and what are there thoughts on premarital sex! He would probably ask deep personal questions about your love/sex life. We tend to do that!
What color is the positive and negative directly on a 92 ford probe fuel pump?
i am trying to rewire the fuel pump on my 92 ford probe and cant get a straight answer on what color the positive and negative are,i see 1black,1 black %26amp; white,and 1 red wire .i'm assuming the black is negative and the black %26amp;white is positive and the red is the remote wire.|||Generally, Red is Positive, and Black is negative on vehicles. For any of their components.
What is the name of that probe that NASA launched last week?
The one that is suppose to explore the moon for a couple of days, and then explode it for ice, what is that probe and can I have more information? Also, if we look closely at the moon with a telescope on the day they blow it up, can we see like an ice cloud blow off the moon?|||It's called the Lunar CRater Observation and Sensing Satellite (LCROSS). NASA hopes to crash it into the southern polar region of the moon. They can analyze the stuff spewed up by the crash and (hopefully) tell if there's water in it.
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LCROSS鈥?/a>
Trying to watch the impact through a backyard telescope would be an interesting thing to try! It would be seriously cool if you could see something.|||I think what you mean is the LRO, Lunar Reconaissanec Orbiter. The craft just enters lunar orbit a couple of days ago. But I don't think the craft has a probe to be blown op on the surface of the moon. It will just peer into shadowed moon craters in search of water ice using the ultraviolet light.
I know a spacecraft that actually blows its probe to the surface to check the structure and the ice in its surface. It's called the Deep Impact probe. And it was launched to a comet 9P/Tempel, not to the moon
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LCROSS鈥?/a>
Trying to watch the impact through a backyard telescope would be an interesting thing to try! It would be seriously cool if you could see something.|||I think what you mean is the LRO, Lunar Reconaissanec Orbiter. The craft just enters lunar orbit a couple of days ago. But I don't think the craft has a probe to be blown op on the surface of the moon. It will just peer into shadowed moon craters in search of water ice using the ultraviolet light.
I know a spacecraft that actually blows its probe to the surface to check the structure and the ice in its surface. It's called the Deep Impact probe. And it was launched to a comet 9P/Tempel, not to the moon
Flipping Cover of headlights for Ford Probe 1989?
I just want to know how to flip open/close the cover on my 1989 ford probe? I don't have the manual so please could you tell me where the switch is located and what does it look like? thanks a lot|||headlights should pop up when you turn the lights on.. if they don't you may have a relay that's gone bad.. if you need to open them manually.. if you open the hood there should be a small cylinder next to the headlight that has a cap on it.. you should be able to take the cap off and manually spin the wheel that's on top of the cylinder to make the headlights open up.. if that's the case but your headlights shut when you shut off the lights.. just disconnect the wire going to the cylinder once they're open, and they'll stay up
How to make a Ford probe 95 (m) faster for little money...?
I have a stock mint condition probe which has been un touched for 2 years. The body is rust and spot free but paint work has some bad fading due to being left in a barn. Back to me question.... (car just flew through MOT so engine is tight) How do i get this 2 litre beast faster from little cash?...|||Drive it off a cliff.|||Sell it and buy a Mustang?|||i had a 92 with 2 litre-i put a greedy turbo on it-changed computer and fuel pump..put perreli tires on it-took it to bonnivell salt flats and got 228 mph out of 3 passes with it-cost me 2 grand
When will they use a tummy probe ultrasound?
I usually have to have a transvag ultrasound due to having a retro grade uterus, Im currently 14 weeks and was wondering when the baby would be big enough to use a trandsabdominal probe? We would like to find out the sex at 16 weeks, but not sure they will be able to see with the tummy probe and they dont offer transvag for gender determintaion at the place we are going. Thanks for any info!|||Usually they will do the abdominal ultrasound once you're in your second trimester. I went in at 13 weeks, and they did it both ways. By 16 weeks, I highly doubt they would do a vaginal ultrasound. At 16 weeks, you may not be able to tell the sex of the baby. It could be too early, especially if it's a girl. My cousin and I both had ultrasounds at 18 weeks, and they immediately told me I was having a boy. They told my cousin it was too early to tell, and she ended up having a girl. You're more likely to find out if you are having a boy. If it's a girl, it might be too early for them to make a positive conclusion. It also depends on the baby's position. Best of luck!
Can a periodontal probe damage your gums?
When the dental assistant uses the periodontal probe to check your periodontal pocket depths, can the use of the probe itself further damage your gums? It seems like it wouldn't be a good thing to wedge a probe down into your gums when you are trying to get your gums to attach more snugly to your teeth.|||The answer to all of your questions is yes: A periodontal probe *could* damage your gums, if it is used by an inadequately trained person. And yes, in most states, only dental hygienists and dentists receive that training.
A dental assistant is a differnt profession, and dental assistants do not (usually) receive training on how to a perio probe, although some states are allowing them to do more patient care.
I suspect, however, that you are just using the word "assistant" in its everday sense--someone who works in the dentist's office and relieves the dentist of some of the patient care duties that the dentist would otherwise perform. That person is probably a trained hygienist rather than a dental assistant.
If you have any concerns about who is working in your mouth, just ask in some non-threatening way. (Something like, "How long did you have to go to school to become a hygienist?") She will probably be proud to discuss her profession with you.|||Dr Albert is correct, dental probes cause no harm. However, a dental assistant is not licenced to do periodontal probing and improper techniques will hurt.|||JANE,
THE USE OF A PERIO PROBE CAUSES NO HARM
A dental assistant is a differnt profession, and dental assistants do not (usually) receive training on how to a perio probe, although some states are allowing them to do more patient care.
I suspect, however, that you are just using the word "assistant" in its everday sense--someone who works in the dentist's office and relieves the dentist of some of the patient care duties that the dentist would otherwise perform. That person is probably a trained hygienist rather than a dental assistant.
If you have any concerns about who is working in your mouth, just ask in some non-threatening way. (Something like, "How long did you have to go to school to become a hygienist?") She will probably be proud to discuss her profession with you.|||Dr Albert is correct, dental probes cause no harm. However, a dental assistant is not licenced to do periodontal probing and improper techniques will hurt.|||JANE,
THE USE OF A PERIO PROBE CAUSES NO HARM
Is a house thermostat available with a remote temperature probe for an exact area?
Is there a a/c thermostat available that you has a remote probe to get the temp reading from that exact location?|||Yup! Here's one:
http://www.smarthome.com/300625.html|||There are several t-stats that do have remote sensors, but all of them are digital and programmable, so they are going to be a bit pricey. The brand we almost always sell is a White-Rogers. They work really well.
http://www.smarthome.com/300625.html|||There are several t-stats that do have remote sensors, but all of them are digital and programmable, so they are going to be a bit pricey. The brand we almost always sell is a White-Rogers. They work really well.
What type of diagnostic connector does a 1994 Ford Probe SE have?
I have a 1994 ford probe SE. It's the 2.0 I4 with a 5 speed manual transmission. I was wondering if it has the conventional ford OBDI connector or if was something abnormal. I have been told the car may be OBDII, but from all the research I've done I think its OBDI. Any help would be appreciated! Thank you.|||Being a 94 it has to have a standard data port and you'd need to use a OBD1 scanner to retrieve data from it.Some scanners supply their own power others are designed so that the data port supplies it power and it's quite common that the wiring, ground, fuse or data port connector have problems.
Hope that helps and best of luck.|||Ford OBD1 connector and it should be located in the engine compartment.|||Yes a 94 will be OBD1 it will still be a standard OBD connector though.
Hope that helps and best of luck.|||Ford OBD1 connector and it should be located in the engine compartment.|||Yes a 94 will be OBD1 it will still be a standard OBD connector though.
What kind of radiation protection does a space probe need and why?
And also, what kind of products, materials, inventions, etc. will be able to protect the space probe from radiation?
Anyone can help? Thanks! =D|||I'm not sure if there are any methods of protecting probes from radiation. Other than metal components of probes becoming charged due to radiation, I don't know of any harmful effects radiation has on space probes. Perhaps there are none, or perhaps we just haven't sent enough probes to actually find the problems. After all, if a probe fails there isn't a team of engineers out there to take it apart and see what went wrong. The people in charge are just happy when they get a little bit of the intended data, so I would imagine they care more about simply holding their investment together than understanding how every component is functioning.
These are just some thoughts of mine on the issue, not much else.|||project? lol, im having the exact project.
Anyone can help? Thanks! =D|||I'm not sure if there are any methods of protecting probes from radiation. Other than metal components of probes becoming charged due to radiation, I don't know of any harmful effects radiation has on space probes. Perhaps there are none, or perhaps we just haven't sent enough probes to actually find the problems. After all, if a probe fails there isn't a team of engineers out there to take it apart and see what went wrong. The people in charge are just happy when they get a little bit of the intended data, so I would imagine they care more about simply holding their investment together than understanding how every component is functioning.
These are just some thoughts of mine on the issue, not much else.|||project? lol, im having the exact project.
Where should I place the probe in my snake's viv?
I purchased a digital thermometer for my ball python's vivarium. I am uncertain as to where to place the probe to assure the most accurate reading. The thermometer came with no suggestions. Do I place the probe in the back center or in the hottest area of the viv? Please advise and I do thank you.|||I use 2 digital thermometers placed on each end. The probes are both placed on the surface of the substrate.|||If I were you I would place it in the coldest spot in the cage because then you will now the lowest temperature instead of the highest. That way if it is like 80 you will now that that is the lowest temperature and the hotter side has to be warmer.|||Ideally, you should know what the hottest and the coldest temps are. In my BP's cage though I have only one digital thermometer at the hottest part of the cage to make sure the thermostat I have for his heat source is working right. Once you have the cage set up with the temp range you want the cold temp will generally remain the same as long as the hot side temp and the temp of the room stay the same. I use a digital infrared thermometer to check the low temp every couple days and it doesn't really change much - only about a degree. I really like the infrared thermometer. You can check air or surface temp anywhere you want in the cage. The simple ones look like small laser pointers and are only about $20-$25.
Can a digital oven thermometer with a probe be used as a candy thermometer?
I would like to put the probe into my candy as it cooks and have the temperature of the candy be shown digitally.|||get a candy thermometer. They are much more accurate with the temps you need to go to with candy making.|||No it cant unfortunately you need a candy or deep fryer thermometer that can go up to higher temperatures than a typical thermometer
You can get one at like wal mart or a hardware store usually for pretty cheap
hope that helps!
You can get one at like wal mart or a hardware store usually for pretty cheap
hope that helps!
At what speed should a space probe be fired from the Earth if it is required to still be travelling at a speed?
At what speed should a space probe be fired from the Earth if it is required to still be travelling at a speed of 6.75 km/s, even after coasting to an exceedingly great distance from the planet (a distance that is essentially infinite)? (Neglect the friction and drag in the atmosphere.)
Please also look at my other questions. Any help is appreciated.|||we can approach this via energy conservation
at the surface of the earth, the object has KE = 1/2 m v0^2 and PE = - GMm/R where G is the newtonian grav cst, M the mass of the earth, m the mass of the spacecraft and R the radius of the earth
at great distance from the earth, the object has KE = 1/2 m V^2 where V = 6750m/s and PE = 0 since it is infinitely far from the earth
we have
1/2 m V^2 = 1/2 m v0^2 - GMm/R
multiply through by 1/2 m and get
V^2 = v0^2 -2GM/R
v= Sqrt[V^2 +2GM/R] = Sqrt[6750^2 + 6.67x10^-11x5.98x10^24kg/6.4x10^6]
v = 13046m/s|||..or since Ek var as v^2..then energy @ take off must've been prop 2 (escapeVel^2+probeVel^2)
Ve=11.183km/sec, probevel=6.75km/sec..so tot of sqres=170.62..take roots %26gt;V start=13km/sec..roughly
Please also look at my other questions. Any help is appreciated.|||we can approach this via energy conservation
at the surface of the earth, the object has KE = 1/2 m v0^2 and PE = - GMm/R where G is the newtonian grav cst, M the mass of the earth, m the mass of the spacecraft and R the radius of the earth
at great distance from the earth, the object has KE = 1/2 m V^2 where V = 6750m/s and PE = 0 since it is infinitely far from the earth
we have
1/2 m V^2 = 1/2 m v0^2 - GMm/R
multiply through by 1/2 m and get
V^2 = v0^2 -2GM/R
v= Sqrt[V^2 +2GM/R] = Sqrt[6750^2 + 6.67x10^-11x5.98x10^24kg/6.4x10^6]
v = 13046m/s|||..or since Ek var as v^2..then energy @ take off must've been prop 2 (escapeVel^2+probeVel^2)
Ve=11.183km/sec, probevel=6.75km/sec..so tot of sqres=170.62..take roots %26gt;V start=13km/sec..roughly
What is better for drifting a honda civic or a ford probe?
I am looking to get into drifting and have found a good deal on a civic and one on a probe. Which will be suit my needs? Thanks|||Neither..|||no u near rear wheel drive|||neither... you need a rear wheel drive for drifting... for your price range youd probably go for a nissan 240sx and you can do some nice swaps to get a faster motor with a turbo...|||neither! They are front wheel drive.|||Neither is a stock rear wheel drive car - so it would not drift, only oversteer into a corner, and that is not the same as drifting.
The probe GT is very good at dirt track racing.
Try a old Mustang 5.0|||Neither will drift, the Civic and the Probe are both front wheel drive, so they wont drift. They would most probably oversteer into a corner. Try getting a Rear Wheel Drive car.
Try using a:
Nissan Silvia
Nissan Skyline
Nissan Z series (240ZX, 280ZX, 300ZX, 350Z)
etc.|||just shoot yourself|||Neither will drift at all. They are both front wheel drive and have low power. They'll just understeer until you run off the road. You need to learn about cars a bit before you even attemp drifting. To drift you need a rear wheel drive car with some power and a good load of skill which I can tell you lack by your choice of vehicles.|||A raft........
The probe GT is very good at dirt track racing.
Try a old Mustang 5.0|||Neither will drift, the Civic and the Probe are both front wheel drive, so they wont drift. They would most probably oversteer into a corner. Try getting a Rear Wheel Drive car.
Try using a:
Nissan Silvia
Nissan Skyline
Nissan Z series (240ZX, 280ZX, 300ZX, 350Z)
etc.|||just shoot yourself|||Neither will drift at all. They are both front wheel drive and have low power. They'll just understeer until you run off the road. You need to learn about cars a bit before you even attemp drifting. To drift you need a rear wheel drive car with some power and a good load of skill which I can tell you lack by your choice of vehicles.|||A raft........
What engines will fit in a 1989 ford probe?
I have an 89 probe with a 4cylinder engine and I need to replace it. What other cars have engines that fit in the probe?|||yes you can buy a production crate motor directly from ford should fit fine rather exspensive though about 5000 cheaper way is to search junk yards and collision centers good luck and hope this helped.|||brigs and stratton|||why not buy a new(er) car and let the Probe lie dead (wherever it is...)|||you,ll have to replace it with the 2,2,that's the only one that will fit back in it,but either the Mazda version or the ford version either one will fit it,but they are hard to find,and a good one is around 400 bucks used if you find one,good luck on it hope this helps.|||i belive 89-92 are all the same body style...but at any rate any mazda mx-6 or ford probe 2.2 will bolt up.....stay with or without the turbo though...depending on which you have.|||427 cubic inch big block chevy with hemi heads and a big blower, with two speed automatic withs .08 to 1 rear end dude this with fit I did it to my 1990 ford probe|||Yes. I have a buddy who knows of a Jap OEM cheapo that bolts on. I don't think you should, but this style hydroplanes. Use soft rain treads. You quest would again wear you thin with th uncomfortable seating, too. Watch out for the sciatic nerve if you are having leg cramping in the least. Other than this, it seems to do Ok with the 2.2 liter. Watch the temperature sensor and that sorry exhaust manifold flange. Carbon coats the plug wires. Any butt ended car blows exhaust back through the hatch.That seal gets dirt in it.If you have troubles at 200000 miles check the ignition switch. Replace it and Oxygen sensor. Computer sensitive.|||Mazda Mx6 and 626 of the 1988-1992
93-97 engine will not work
93-97 engine will not work
Is a standard 1993 ford probe front wheel or rear wheel drive?
I need to change the brakes on my 1993 Ford Probe, it's not a special model or anything its just standard, and I need to know if there are brakes on the back wheels as well as on the front wheels. Does anyone know if it's front wheel or rear wheel or is there anyway that I can tell?|||Its a front wheel drive, and yes you have brakes on both the front and the rear.|||All Probes were front-wheel drive. A low-trim model probably had drum brakes in the rear instead of disc. (I had a '93 Mazda 626, built on the same assembly line on the same general platform, and that's the way it was.)|||Take it to a garage. I'm not trying to be an ***, but if you don't know that all four wheels have brakes, you might be in over your head.
What temperature should a meat probe read when cooking chicken?
when cooking chicken, what temperature should the meat probe read when it is ready?|||Depends on the cut of chicken and how dry you like it.
Some government agencies say cook it until dry and tasteless, but I prefer to cook a little less.
Guidelines say 180 degrees for whole poultry, 170 for breasts, and 165 for ground poultry.
I usually cook breasts to about 160-165, depending on size (larger to a lower temperature), then take out of the oven, cover with foil, and let residual heat bring them up to temp. If you cook to 170, then take out of the oven or other heat, you end up with 180 or 185 degree dry chicken. The larger the piece, the lower the temp you cook to, because it will still continue to cook after you take it out of the oven. A large chicken can easily climb 10 or 15 degrees even after you take it out of the oven and even if not covered.
For whole chicken, use a digital thermometer with a remote probe and you can monitor the internal temp from the outside of the oven. I would pull when the thigh is 170 or the breast is 170, then cover with foil and remove from the oven until the temp reaches 175-180 (If you feel safe to do so, I take out at 165, and don't let it rise about 170-175). Then, uncover, let rest a few minutes, then carve.
If you don't use a probe thermometer already inserted to monitor temperature, then break the skin with an instant read thermometer, you are just letting all the juices run out before the poultry has time to set and let the juices back into the meat.|||Whole chicken should be cooked to an internal temperature of 165 degrees. When you poke it with a fork the juices should run clear.|||ideally about 80 or above.|||68oc|||over guidelines of hot food about 75 to 80 and cut at leg and juices should be clear no blood|||76 degrees centigrade in the thickest part and maintain the temperature for 30 seconds.
That is the standard used by most restaurants.|||technically it should read 70 degrees c for two minutes, but if the juices run clear then it should be cooked.|||165 degrees Fahrenheit.
Some government agencies say cook it until dry and tasteless, but I prefer to cook a little less.
Guidelines say 180 degrees for whole poultry, 170 for breasts, and 165 for ground poultry.
I usually cook breasts to about 160-165, depending on size (larger to a lower temperature), then take out of the oven, cover with foil, and let residual heat bring them up to temp. If you cook to 170, then take out of the oven or other heat, you end up with 180 or 185 degree dry chicken. The larger the piece, the lower the temp you cook to, because it will still continue to cook after you take it out of the oven. A large chicken can easily climb 10 or 15 degrees even after you take it out of the oven and even if not covered.
For whole chicken, use a digital thermometer with a remote probe and you can monitor the internal temp from the outside of the oven. I would pull when the thigh is 170 or the breast is 170, then cover with foil and remove from the oven until the temp reaches 175-180 (If you feel safe to do so, I take out at 165, and don't let it rise about 170-175). Then, uncover, let rest a few minutes, then carve.
If you don't use a probe thermometer already inserted to monitor temperature, then break the skin with an instant read thermometer, you are just letting all the juices run out before the poultry has time to set and let the juices back into the meat.|||Whole chicken should be cooked to an internal temperature of 165 degrees. When you poke it with a fork the juices should run clear.|||ideally about 80 or above.|||68oc|||over guidelines of hot food about 75 to 80 and cut at leg and juices should be clear no blood|||76 degrees centigrade in the thickest part and maintain the temperature for 30 seconds.
That is the standard used by most restaurants.|||technically it should read 70 degrees c for two minutes, but if the juices run clear then it should be cooked.|||165 degrees Fahrenheit.
What if an alien probe landed on Earth tomorrow?
Say, there's an intelligent spices like us that we didn't pick up radio waves from for some reason. What if their robotic probe landed tomorrow?|||Not a whole lot would really change. People don't seem to do well with actual evidence. It would be quickly forgotten or ignored over who was the next likely winner of American Idol...|||Then it would be on the news, every 5 minutes you will see something about it on the news. Then some people won't believe it and say the government did it. Others will be happy that we finally contacted life from outside Earth. Others will believe is the messiah that God sent us. Others will be scared and think they want war. and many other reactions. It all depends.
For sure it will be the biggest event in the history of science and specifically astronomy.|||The government would cover it up and the public would never know about it.
If it was too big to cover up, there would be uncontrollable mass hysteria.|||I would welcome some Intelligent spices! I'm getting board with my cooking. Some intelligent spices should liven things up a bit.
For sure it will be the biggest event in the history of science and specifically astronomy.|||The government would cover it up and the public would never know about it.
If it was too big to cover up, there would be uncontrollable mass hysteria.|||I would welcome some Intelligent spices! I'm getting board with my cooking. Some intelligent spices should liven things up a bit.
How much would it cost to Import a Ford Probe from Europe?
I have a 1998 European Ford Probe GT that i really want to take back to the states with me. Can anyone tell me what the difference is between the European models and the American model? Any information would be a lot of help.|||It's just not worth it, unless you just can't live without that car. Shipping it would be the cheapest part of all this, and that would cost a small fortune. Once you got it to America the government wouldn't let you
drive it or tag it until it meets all the EPA pollution and safety regulations for that model year. That means you have to hire a conversion company to make the car legal in the US, because you can't just do that yourself. The government wants a certified company to do the conversions. They run you through endless red tape, time and expense. And a government inspector is part of the whole thing, and he can make it as expensive as he wants for you. This will be the biggest and most espensive mightmare you can imagine if you try it. So unless you've got thousands of dollars to spend I wouldn't do it. Not to mention the 8-12 months it will take for all the different government agencies to sign off on the car.
I know this is not what you wanted to hear but it's the ugly truth, sorry! Just look up all the regulations on this at the U.S. Government web sites and you'll see what I'm talking about.|||You sure it's a '98? Everything I've seen says that Ford of Europe dropped the Probe after 1997, replacing it with the Cougar.|||That would cost a ton.
And that is not exaggerating, it would probably cost 2K.|||It wouldn't be worth it. Sell it and buy a new one in the states.
drive it or tag it until it meets all the EPA pollution and safety regulations for that model year. That means you have to hire a conversion company to make the car legal in the US, because you can't just do that yourself. The government wants a certified company to do the conversions. They run you through endless red tape, time and expense. And a government inspector is part of the whole thing, and he can make it as expensive as he wants for you. This will be the biggest and most espensive mightmare you can imagine if you try it. So unless you've got thousands of dollars to spend I wouldn't do it. Not to mention the 8-12 months it will take for all the different government agencies to sign off on the car.
I know this is not what you wanted to hear but it's the ugly truth, sorry! Just look up all the regulations on this at the U.S. Government web sites and you'll see what I'm talking about.|||You sure it's a '98? Everything I've seen says that Ford of Europe dropped the Probe after 1997, replacing it with the Cougar.|||That would cost a ton.
And that is not exaggerating, it would probably cost 2K.|||It wouldn't be worth it. Sell it and buy a new one in the states.
94 ford probe wont start unless is it being jumped by another car, but the battery is not dead?
i have a 94 for probe and i took it to have the battery and alternator checked and they are both fine, but when you get in the car all the lights are on and the door dings, but when i turn the key everything goes dim and the engine will not turn over, it sounds like it is starting to turn over, but dosnt. what could the problem be.|||well if everything checks out good you need to take the battery terminals off the battery and clean the battery terminals and cables real good with a wire brush and reinstall as they must not be making good contact.|||My Ford Probe does the same thing, but I found a way around this problem if you can't find a working solution. If I leave one of my car doors open for a minute or two, then slam it, the car gets enough charge to start. Turn the key very slowly and only after your battery reader has reached its max.
|||bad ground, or dirty battery connections. That would be a good place to start.
good luck|||Not seeing it I would say that your starter is drawing to much power. I would also guess that it needs a new starter.|||bad battery..many car will run radio/lites and not turn starter|||Start by taking off the battery cables, cleaning both the battery posts and the cable terminals, then reinstalling, making sure they are tight. If it now starts, that was your problem. If not, it's your battery, perhaps a low cell that wouldn't show on a test except under load.
Report Abuse
|||bad ground, or dirty battery connections. That would be a good place to start.
good luck|||Not seeing it I would say that your starter is drawing to much power. I would also guess that it needs a new starter.|||bad battery..many car will run radio/lites and not turn starter|||Start by taking off the battery cables, cleaning both the battery posts and the cable terminals, then reinstalling, making sure they are tight. If it now starts, that was your problem. If not, it's your battery, perhaps a low cell that wouldn't show on a test except under load.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of network probe please?
i want to know what are the advantages and disadvantages of network probe|||Advantages... find out which computer is sending out irrelevant packets, and what users are download hogs, and who's (systems) trying to access your network.
Disadvantages... Taxing on your network,,, slows down your network, so many more packets will be sent from monitoring every connection on your network.
Unless your having network problems, and you want find out why run it... if your not having no network problems dont.
Disadvantages... Taxing on your network,,, slows down your network, so many more packets will be sent from monitoring every connection on your network.
Unless your having network problems, and you want find out why run it... if your not having no network problems dont.
What would it cost to replace the exhaust on a '97 Ford Probe GTS?
About 6 months ago I bought a '97 Ford Probe GTS. It has an aftermarket exhaust, which is extremely loud. I didn't like it then, because of the noise, and recently, I occasionally set off car alarms just driving by. Dunno if it's gotten louder or what, but either way, it's too loud for my taste. What would a stock exhaust cost me to buy and have installed? Should I just take it to a local Ford dealership to be done? Thanks.|||Meineke is reasonable and so is Pep Boys. Stay away from the dealership. They will rob you blind.|||Take it to any local exhaust shop (not a dealership) and have them replace the muffler with a quieter one. They will know what to do from there. Should cost no more than $150
What is the point of a "probe" in a TEE (for a sonogram of the heart)?
My mother has to go for a test called a TEE to check the condition of her mitral valve. SHe is getting the test on Tuesday (April 1) and is told that she will have to swallow a "probe". What is it and what is the purpose of it?? On wikipedia, there are so many things listed under probe:
robotic probe
probe card
test probe
SS7 probe
Hybridization probe
a class of surgical instruments|||great question!
T.E.E. stands for Trans-Esophageal Electrocardiogram... it's for, as you said, the cardiologist to get a better look at your mom's heart. When doing Trans-Throasic Echocardiograms (across the chest wall), the image is not as clear, and the radiologist can't get as clear of a picture-- in the TEE your mom will get, they'll actually put something down her esophagus (so she'll have to swallow it) and there it will stay, briefly, while they get the image they need... it shouldn't be incredibly uncomfortable, and as far as I know it doesn't hurt... its very minimally invasive.
has she had a mitral valve replacement yet? If so was it a prosthetic or bio-prosthetic? I'd be happy to talk sometime with you about the anticoagulation therapy that is necessary to go along with each of those- I've worked in several coagulation-clinics- feel free to email me if you have any more questions...|||Hi! I had this done recently. First they swab the throat with a numbing agent to stop your gag reflex. Then you are sedated through an IV, but still a little bit awake. A long tube (the probe) has a camera in it -- the cardiologist guides it through your mouth and into the esophagus as you swallow. You are sedated a bit more and don't remember much of the procedure. It is an ultrasound much closer to your heart than a regular ECHO test, so the MD can see the valves much better and check the blood regurgitation.
Best of luck to your Mom--she'll do fine!
robotic probe
probe card
test probe
SS7 probe
Hybridization probe
a class of surgical instruments|||great question!
T.E.E. stands for Trans-Esophageal Electrocardiogram... it's for, as you said, the cardiologist to get a better look at your mom's heart. When doing Trans-Throasic Echocardiograms (across the chest wall), the image is not as clear, and the radiologist can't get as clear of a picture-- in the TEE your mom will get, they'll actually put something down her esophagus (so she'll have to swallow it) and there it will stay, briefly, while they get the image they need... it shouldn't be incredibly uncomfortable, and as far as I know it doesn't hurt... its very minimally invasive.
has she had a mitral valve replacement yet? If so was it a prosthetic or bio-prosthetic? I'd be happy to talk sometime with you about the anticoagulation therapy that is necessary to go along with each of those- I've worked in several coagulation-clinics- feel free to email me if you have any more questions...|||Hi! I had this done recently. First they swab the throat with a numbing agent to stop your gag reflex. Then you are sedated through an IV, but still a little bit awake. A long tube (the probe) has a camera in it -- the cardiologist guides it through your mouth and into the esophagus as you swallow. You are sedated a bit more and don't remember much of the procedure. It is an ultrasound much closer to your heart than a regular ECHO test, so the MD can see the valves much better and check the blood regurgitation.
Best of luck to your Mom--she'll do fine!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)