A space probe is carried by a rocket into outer space where it continues to move on its own in a straight line.
What keeps the probe moving?
1. a propeller
2. Nothing; the probe will eventually stop.
3. None of these
4. The gravitation forces from different stars and planets
5. Nothing specific; in the absence of forces it would continue moving in a straight line.|||it's momentum keeps it going, and it will not not stop unless another force acts on it opposite to the direction it is moving
out of those choices I would go with number 5|||A space probe is carried by a rocket into outer space where it continues to move on its own in a straight line.
When the probe is released, it has the same velocity as it did before it was released.
When the probe is released, it has the same mass as it did before it was released.
When the probe is released, it has the same momentum as it did before it was released.
In the absence of external forces its momentum would continue moving it in a straight line
What keeps the probe moving?
1. a propeller
2. Nothing; the probe will eventually stop.
3. None of these
4. The gravitation forces from different stars and planets
5. Nothing specific; in the absence of forces it would continue moving in a straight line|||Nothing keeps it going. The rocket releases the probe and leaves it there in space. They should know when to let the rocket stop it's movement.
Tuesday, November 22, 2011
How much can I amp up the horse power on a 97 ford v6 probe GT?
I have Ford Probe GT and the current horse power is 164 and that is the factory set I was wondering how much horse power can the car achieve and what would I do in order to bring it up to the maximum horse power it can achieve?|||A turbo was an option when new. Maybe kit available or a add on super charger kit. Without modifying engine not much else.|||intake/headers/exhaust/port and polish. cams/ cam geared cam shaft/ and you should be good with about 190 to 215hp
A space probe on the surface of Mars sends a radio signal back to the Earth, a distance of 9.75 multiplied by?
A space probe on the surface of Mars sends a radio signal back to the Earth, a distance of 9.75 multiplied by 107 km. Radio waves travel at the speed of light (3.00 multiplied by 108 m/s). How many seconds does it take for the signal to reach the Earth?|||time = distance / velocity = 9.75 x 10^7 km / 3.00 x 10^8 m/s = 9.75 x 10^10 m / 3.00 x 10^8 m/s = 325 seconds|||I'm answering this question by other method i did 2 days ago in my physics class.
As Radio signal has same speed as LIGHT. It takes 8.3Min to travel from sun to earth and 12.67min from sun to mars.
If you subtract 12.67-8.3= you get 4.37min( from earth to mars)
To convert this in to seconds, you do conversions.
(4.37min/1)(60sec/1min) CROSS MULTIPLY this, cancel out min.
Your answer will be 262.3sec .|||Your numbers are not correct. Earth and Mars are much farther apart, and light travels much more quickly than that.
As Radio signal has same speed as LIGHT. It takes 8.3Min to travel from sun to earth and 12.67min from sun to mars.
If you subtract 12.67-8.3= you get 4.37min( from earth to mars)
To convert this in to seconds, you do conversions.
(4.37min/1)(60sec/1min) CROSS MULTIPLY this, cancel out min.
Your answer will be 262.3sec .|||Your numbers are not correct. Earth and Mars are much farther apart, and light travels much more quickly than that.
How do you use an amp probe for a 220v outlet?
i know how to do it for a 110v but do you but the probe around both or each and add?|||Put the probe around each hot wire (red %26amp; black) and the neutral wire individually, but don't add. If the load is connected only to the hot wires, the currents in the hot wires should be equal and there should be no current in the neutral wire. If there is something connected between one of the hot wires and the neutral, the current in the neutral should equal the difference between the currents in the two hot wires. To verify that the current does not exceed the circuit rating, compare the highest hot wire reading with the circuit breaker rating.
An electric clothes dryer may have the motor and timer connected between one of the hot wires and neutral and the heater connected between the two hot wires. Other loads may also have combinations of 110 and 220 volt loads connected internally.|||i would put the red in the hot side and the black in the negative, if you have 110 or around it then you good, then leave the black and move the red to the other hot, once again you should have 110. if both read 110 together they make 220|||amp probe implies you have a current meter, not a volt meter.
ammeters, current meters, always have to be in series with the load, ie, connect between one of the hot lines and the load.
.
An electric clothes dryer may have the motor and timer connected between one of the hot wires and neutral and the heater connected between the two hot wires. Other loads may also have combinations of 110 and 220 volt loads connected internally.|||i would put the red in the hot side and the black in the negative, if you have 110 or around it then you good, then leave the black and move the red to the other hot, once again you should have 110. if both read 110 together they make 220|||amp probe implies you have a current meter, not a volt meter.
ammeters, current meters, always have to be in series with the load, ie, connect between one of the hot lines and the load.
.
Why so many countries want to probe moon,what we can get from the moon?
Recently US want to back to moon program and China and india already has plan to probe moon.I wonder what we can get from the moon.As I know all those program are very expensive.|||There are three reasons--any one of which will justify the expense in the long run.
1) Solving the problems that have to be solved to get to the moon generates a wealth of scientific and technical knowledge--which will transfer into a variety of usfule technological applications right here on earth--making our lives better and spurring economic growth.
2) Ultimately, moving out into space gives us access to resources (as well as potential places like Mars where people can live) far in excess of the resources we could ever hope to have on Earth. But the capability of accessing thos resources requires that we develop a space-going technology far beyond what we have now. Going to the moon is a first step on the road to doing that.
3) The moon itself is an entire world. We already know it has extensive resources. And in at least one case (Helium 3) in far greater quantity thanon Earth--and that particular substance is an ideal fuel for nuclear fusion when we devlop that technology fully in a few decades.
Ummmm--there's a 4th reason, actually. National prestige. Up to a point that's okay--its fine to be proud of your country's accomplishments as long as it doesn't bet twisted into an excuse to deride or belittle others. But I mention it because to politicians it is important--because it translates into popular support.|||One day we all may have to move there|||Once India, Pakistan, Israel and USA are done blowing the world up with the Nukes. Where do you think all the presidents and important people from these countries would go?|||Well, the moon would be the best military base there is - no weapons can reach it and capable of striking anywhere on Earth. We might have to move if the world goes insane and nukes itself to oblivion. It's also a potential source of mining and water harvesting.|||almost everything you use in your every day life, has come from NASA research projects. everything from what you wear, how you wear it and even the mattresses you sleep on. hell, NASA invinted velcro. If we colonize the moon, that means we can start learning how to live on other planets.|||Yes it is expensive but it is worth it. what do we get? first off knowledge. second, a first step to colonization. eventually we are going to have to get off this rock; it is simply too dangerous. remember, if the planet goes one way or another (meteor, nuclear war, whatever) it wont just take us; it'll take Einstein, Eratosthenes, Sagan, Michelangelo and countless others. And all of this would have been for nothing.|||Well, we can get an insight possibly on how the Moon became a barren waste. Or how planets or the Solar System were formed.
Oh, don't forget the amount of Meteors (or Asteroids) that have struck the moon over the Millenniums that we can study their makeup from.
Oh... and as a possible living area for our quickly overcrowded planet, Mother Earth.|||It costs so much to start long trips into the cosmos from down here. It is much less expensive to start a star trek from the moon. America's NASA expects to find water ice at the moon's poles. Water, as you may be aware, can be broken down into Hydrogen and Oxygen - fuel for rockets.|||Gold, gold, GOLD. Silver and gold, silver and gold enough for everyone, hurry grab your pan and hip waiters and buy your seat on the next ship to the moon.|||I am rather surprised that those who replied before me have not even mentioned the possibility of H3. H3 is a form of Hydrogen that is 'easily' fusable. It is incredibly abundant on the moon. Energy alone would be worth it. Second, I think that the moon is the next step in humanities evolution. We have conqured our planet and need to move into the next parts of our solar system. The moon is a tremendous value for space exploration and colonization.|||When they get smart enough to put a telescope on the far side, We will see our galaxy more clearly Than we do with Hubble. Plus it is a natural Satellite. Duh.|||To own a piece of moon pie or even declare independent of a country's moon if NASA indeed faked their landing on moon.
As far as it goes, I still can't see the USA flag and the NASA space vehicle on the moon which they left it over there.
Did anyone know the land coordinates on the moon? :) cheers.|||Well, we got cool things like Tang, velcro and cordless drills from the Apollo program.
I think this is more about national prestige than practical benefit.|||One of the things that the being able to get resources from the moon will allow is orbital manufacturing. Zero Gravity manufacturing promises to allow for some incredible technology, but the cost to get materials from Earth to any sort of orbital platform is far to expensive. It would be ~ 20 times cheaper to get materials from the moon to such a platform. Also, oxygen could be derived from many of the materials on the moon.|||Technology advancement.|||We're tired of probing each other, so why not try something different? Most people on Earth just like saying the word 'probe'.
Probe...probe...probe. There. I feel better.
1) Solving the problems that have to be solved to get to the moon generates a wealth of scientific and technical knowledge--which will transfer into a variety of usfule technological applications right here on earth--making our lives better and spurring economic growth.
2) Ultimately, moving out into space gives us access to resources (as well as potential places like Mars where people can live) far in excess of the resources we could ever hope to have on Earth. But the capability of accessing thos resources requires that we develop a space-going technology far beyond what we have now. Going to the moon is a first step on the road to doing that.
3) The moon itself is an entire world. We already know it has extensive resources. And in at least one case (Helium 3) in far greater quantity thanon Earth--and that particular substance is an ideal fuel for nuclear fusion when we devlop that technology fully in a few decades.
Ummmm--there's a 4th reason, actually. National prestige. Up to a point that's okay--its fine to be proud of your country's accomplishments as long as it doesn't bet twisted into an excuse to deride or belittle others. But I mention it because to politicians it is important--because it translates into popular support.|||One day we all may have to move there|||Once India, Pakistan, Israel and USA are done blowing the world up with the Nukes. Where do you think all the presidents and important people from these countries would go?|||Well, the moon would be the best military base there is - no weapons can reach it and capable of striking anywhere on Earth. We might have to move if the world goes insane and nukes itself to oblivion. It's also a potential source of mining and water harvesting.|||almost everything you use in your every day life, has come from NASA research projects. everything from what you wear, how you wear it and even the mattresses you sleep on. hell, NASA invinted velcro. If we colonize the moon, that means we can start learning how to live on other planets.|||Yes it is expensive but it is worth it. what do we get? first off knowledge. second, a first step to colonization. eventually we are going to have to get off this rock; it is simply too dangerous. remember, if the planet goes one way or another (meteor, nuclear war, whatever) it wont just take us; it'll take Einstein, Eratosthenes, Sagan, Michelangelo and countless others. And all of this would have been for nothing.|||Well, we can get an insight possibly on how the Moon became a barren waste. Or how planets or the Solar System were formed.
Oh, don't forget the amount of Meteors (or Asteroids) that have struck the moon over the Millenniums that we can study their makeup from.
Oh... and as a possible living area for our quickly overcrowded planet, Mother Earth.|||It costs so much to start long trips into the cosmos from down here. It is much less expensive to start a star trek from the moon. America's NASA expects to find water ice at the moon's poles. Water, as you may be aware, can be broken down into Hydrogen and Oxygen - fuel for rockets.|||Gold, gold, GOLD. Silver and gold, silver and gold enough for everyone, hurry grab your pan and hip waiters and buy your seat on the next ship to the moon.|||I am rather surprised that those who replied before me have not even mentioned the possibility of H3. H3 is a form of Hydrogen that is 'easily' fusable. It is incredibly abundant on the moon. Energy alone would be worth it. Second, I think that the moon is the next step in humanities evolution. We have conqured our planet and need to move into the next parts of our solar system. The moon is a tremendous value for space exploration and colonization.|||When they get smart enough to put a telescope on the far side, We will see our galaxy more clearly Than we do with Hubble. Plus it is a natural Satellite. Duh.|||To own a piece of moon pie or even declare independent of a country's moon if NASA indeed faked their landing on moon.
As far as it goes, I still can't see the USA flag and the NASA space vehicle on the moon which they left it over there.
Did anyone know the land coordinates on the moon? :) cheers.|||Well, we got cool things like Tang, velcro and cordless drills from the Apollo program.
I think this is more about national prestige than practical benefit.|||One of the things that the being able to get resources from the moon will allow is orbital manufacturing. Zero Gravity manufacturing promises to allow for some incredible technology, but the cost to get materials from Earth to any sort of orbital platform is far to expensive. It would be ~ 20 times cheaper to get materials from the moon to such a platform. Also, oxygen could be derived from many of the materials on the moon.|||Technology advancement.|||We're tired of probing each other, so why not try something different? Most people on Earth just like saying the word 'probe'.
Probe...probe...probe. There. I feel better.
I have a 1990 ford probe gt 4cyl turbo and im switching it from auto to manual any suggestions?
1990 ford probe gt turbo 4 cylinder im switching from an automatic transmission to a manual transmission does any one have any suggestions or know any good web sites to look at for answers?|||Well, on a twenty year old car that's worth around $1300, why bother? This isn't a classic car with a great reputation, it's a poorly built ford with dated styling. You can do better. Much better.
This car scored a 38 out of 100 by Consumerguide Automotive(in school, that's an F -- ). Poor ride quality, poor controls/materials, a very noisy ride, and early failure of the turbo fours were some of the low-lights. Souping this car up is like putting breast implants in a 70 year old woman.
If you do succeed with this project, don't ever leave your wallet at home. With the added stress placed on the aging engine and suspension, you'll be amazed at how fast things start to break.
I'd save up a little more dough, sell this thing off (it books around $1300), and get yourself a civic, celica, eclipse,etc. For around $2500 you can get any one of these cars in nice shape, with a reliable factory installed manual tranny. With the sale of your car, and the $ you save not doing the tranny, you're already really close.|||You could buy a manual shift probe a lot cheaper that making yours manual.
clutch pedal linkage assembly, brake pedal assy, transmission, cv axles, clutch kit, clutch master cylinder, slave cylinder, shifter assy, shifter linkage, flywheel, starter, computer, wiring harness, labor.
Many of these parts could be obsolete and unavailable. you could spend 4-5 times what the car is worth.|||advice is dont...after 1000 in cost maybe 1500 it will not run well unless you change ECU trade it in on your dream car..
This car scored a 38 out of 100 by Consumerguide Automotive(in school, that's an F -- ). Poor ride quality, poor controls/materials, a very noisy ride, and early failure of the turbo fours were some of the low-lights. Souping this car up is like putting breast implants in a 70 year old woman.
If you do succeed with this project, don't ever leave your wallet at home. With the added stress placed on the aging engine and suspension, you'll be amazed at how fast things start to break.
I'd save up a little more dough, sell this thing off (it books around $1300), and get yourself a civic, celica, eclipse,etc. For around $2500 you can get any one of these cars in nice shape, with a reliable factory installed manual tranny. With the sale of your car, and the $ you save not doing the tranny, you're already really close.|||You could buy a manual shift probe a lot cheaper that making yours manual.
clutch pedal linkage assembly, brake pedal assy, transmission, cv axles, clutch kit, clutch master cylinder, slave cylinder, shifter assy, shifter linkage, flywheel, starter, computer, wiring harness, labor.
Many of these parts could be obsolete and unavailable. you could spend 4-5 times what the car is worth.|||advice is dont...after 1000 in cost maybe 1500 it will not run well unless you change ECU trade it in on your dream car..
Probe thermometer for puddings cakes etc?
I use a probe thermometer for cooking joints of meat but does anybody know if it can be used for cooking cakes and pouddings. I cant seem to find a tempreature guideline.|||Ive never heard of a probe thermometer used for cakes and puddings but I use a knife and if it comes out clean its done. Top tip though, if you are baking a cake, be really carefull not to slam the oven door, the bang will make your cake sink. Its not the cold air that does it, its the bang.
Good luck. xxx|||Generally, if your oven is functioning properly, the TIME needed to bake as described in the recipie is enough. Check cakes with a bamboo shis-kebab skewer through the middle. If it comes out clean and dry, your cake is ready. If it comes out wet, you need to keep baking. Puddings are generally easy to tell...The top browns nicely if you are baking it. On stovetop, you neeed to keep stirring and watch the time. Once it starts to thicken up and the necessary time prescribed has passed, fill your ramekins and let it set in the fridge for at least 2 hours. Gas ranges are best as the tempreture is going to be dead on. Electric ranges kinda suck cos they get hot, then tune down...get hot, tune down...
follow the temp. and time guidelines on the box and you should be ok.|||generally with cakes you stick a skewer or knife in and if it comes out clean its cooked!
you can buy a "candy" thermometer and I assume it would come with instructions and guidelines for use.|||Yes but a good trick to do is to touch the top of the cake and if it bounces back and just comming away from the sides it means it is ready the last thing you want to do is to probe it
Good luck. xxx|||Generally, if your oven is functioning properly, the TIME needed to bake as described in the recipie is enough. Check cakes with a bamboo shis-kebab skewer through the middle. If it comes out clean and dry, your cake is ready. If it comes out wet, you need to keep baking. Puddings are generally easy to tell...The top browns nicely if you are baking it. On stovetop, you neeed to keep stirring and watch the time. Once it starts to thicken up and the necessary time prescribed has passed, fill your ramekins and let it set in the fridge for at least 2 hours. Gas ranges are best as the tempreture is going to be dead on. Electric ranges kinda suck cos they get hot, then tune down...get hot, tune down...
follow the temp. and time guidelines on the box and you should be ok.|||generally with cakes you stick a skewer or knife in and if it comes out clean its cooked!
you can buy a "candy" thermometer and I assume it would come with instructions and guidelines for use.|||Yes but a good trick to do is to touch the top of the cake and if it bounces back and just comming away from the sides it means it is ready the last thing you want to do is to probe it
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)